Article thumbnail

Heart Failure Guidelines, Performance Measures, and the Practice of Medicine Mind the Gap

By Jalal K. Ghali, Barry M. Massie, Douglas L. Mann and Michael W. Rich

Abstract

Guidelines have rather quickly assumed a central role in health care delivery in the U.S. They have become the foundation on which performance measures are built and, therefore, a major player in assessing the quality of care provided by individuals and institutions, the ramifications of which involve reputation, reimbursement, and litigation. We are concerned, however, that in our enthusiasm for collectively endorsing these guidelines, we are marginalizing the importance of physician judgment and inadvertently risking the conversion of guidelines into “cookbooks.” We believe that this viewpoint, while unequivocally acknowledging the fundamental importance of guidelines, simultaneously provides a critically important perspective on the potential for misuse of both guidelines and performance measures. Further, we hope that publication of this viewpoint will help temper enthusiasm for overzealous conversion of guidelines into performance measures, thereby restoring the vital role of physician judgment and insight into patient management

Publisher: American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.013
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://s3.amazonaws.com/prod-... (external link)
  • https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.