Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

On the methodology of ISEW, GPI and related measures: some constructive comments and some doubt on the 'threshold' hypothesis

By Eric Neumayer
Topics: GE Environmental Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2000
DOI identifier: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00192-0
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:18908
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A social discount rate for the United Kingdom, Working paper GEC 95-01. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.
  2. (1999). An index of sustainable economic welfare — Can it be evidence for the ‘threshold’ hypothesis?, mimeo. London School of Economics,
  3. (1999). An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile. doi
  4. (1998). An index of sustainable economic welfare for Italy, Working paper 5/98. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei,
  5. (1994). An index of sustainable economic welfare for Scotland, doi
  6. An index of sustainable economic welfare for the UK 1950-1996.
  7. (1999). BP Statistical Review of World Energy. doi
  8. (1996). Climate Change doi
  9. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: A threshold hypothesis. doi
  10. (1989). For the commond good.
  11. (1999). Has Australia surpassed its optimal macroeconomic scale? Finding out with the aid of ‘benefit’ and ‘cost’ accounts and a sustainable net benefit index. doi
  12. (1995). ISEW for the Netherlands: Preliminary results and some proposals for further research. IMSA,
  13. (1995). Measuring sustainable economic welfare: A critique of the UK ISEW, Working paper GEC 95-08. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment,
  14. (1999). Misplaced concreteness: Measuring genuine progress and the nature of money, paper presented at the Canadian Society for
  15. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. doi
  16. (2000). Resource accounting in measures of unsustainability: Challenging the World Bank’s conclusions. Environmental and Resource Economics (forthcoming) 29 Nordhaus,
  17. (1998). Should we pursue measurement of the natural capital stock? doi
  18. (1996). Sustainability and constant consumption paths in open economies with exhaustible resources. doi
  19. (1996). Sustainable energy for tomorrow’s world - the case for an optimistic view of the future. doi
  20. (1991). Tax policy to combat global warming: On designing a carbon tax. In: doi
  21. (1999). The doi
  22. (1999). The genuine progress indicator: methodological developments and results from Australia. doi
  23. (1997). The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) as an alternative to GDP in measuring GDP in measuring economic welfare. The results of the Austrian (revised) ISEW calculation 1955-1992’. doi
  24. (1994). The index of sustainable economic welfare: A case study of the Federal Republic of Germany. In:
  25. (1999). The ISEW: Not an index of sustainable economic welfare. doi
  26. (1989). The proper calculation of income from depletable natural resources. In: doi
  27. (1986). Thermodynamic and economic concepts as related to resource-use policies: Synthesis. doi
  28. (1999). Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Edward Elgar, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.