Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Relying on informal care in the new century? Informal care for elderly people in England to 2031

By Linda Pickard, Raphael Wittenberg, Adelina Comas-Herrera, Bleddyn Davies and Robin Darton


The research reported here is concerned with the future of informal care over the next thirty years and the effect of changes in informal care on demand for formal services. The research draws on a PSSRU computer simulation model which has produced projections to 2031 for long-term care for England. The latest Government Actuary's Department (GAD) 1996-based marital status projections are used here. These projections yield unexpected results in that they indicate that more elderly people are likely to receive informal care than previously projected. The underlying reason is that the GAD figures project a fall in the number of widows and rise in the number of elderly women with partners. What this implies is that ‘spouse carers’ are likely to become increasingly important. This raises issues about the need for support by carers since spouse carers tend to be themselves elderly and are often in poor health. The article explores a number of ‘scenarios’ around informal care, including scenarios in which the supply of informal care is severely restricted and a scenario in which more support is given to carers by developing ‘carer-blind’ services. This last scenario has had particular relevance for the Royal Commission on Long Term Care

Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2000
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). 1998-based national population projections for the United Kingdom and constituent countries. doi
  2. (1999). A National Strategy for Carers. doi
  3. (1994). Accuracy and uncertainty of the national population projections for the United Kingdom. Population Trends, doi
  4. (1999). Alternative Models of Care for Older People. Royal Commission on Long Term Care. With Respect to Old Age: Long Term Care ± Rights and Responsibilities. Research Volume 2,C m4192-II}2.
  5. (1997). Care or empowerment? A disability rights perspective. doi
  6. (1994). Carers Perceived. Policy and Practice in Informal Care. doi
  7. (1989). Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond.
  8. (1998). CFAS (Resource Implications Study of Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study). doi
  9. (1992). Challenging the `spectre of old age': community care for older people in the 1990s. Social Policy Review,
  10. (1995). Combining formal and informal care in serving frail elderly people. doi
  11. (1996). Committee on Future Health Scenarios).
  12. (1992). Counting care: numbers and types of informal carers.
  13. (2001). Demand for Long-Term Care for Elderly People in England to . doi
  14. (1998). Demand for Long-Term Care. Projections of Long-Term Care Finance for Elderly People. PSSRU, doi
  15. (1995). Demographic in¯uences on the future of family care. In
  16. (1994). Different Types of Care, Different Types of Carer. Evidence from the General Household Survey. doi
  17. (1990). Elderly carers: the need for appropriate intervention. doi
  18. (1996). Elderly people in complex and non-private (institutional) households: changes in England and Wales 1971±1991. House of Commons, Health Committee. Long-Term Care: Future Provision and Funding.
  19. (1992). Elderly People: Choice, Participation and Satisfaction. Policy Studies Institute, doi
  20. (1997). Equity and efficiency in community care: from muddle to model and model to ? Policy and Politics, doi
  21. (2000). Equity and Efficiency Policy in Community Care: Needs, Service Productivities, Outcomes and their Implications. Ashgate for PSSRU,
  22. (1995). Family care and changing family structure: bad news for the elderly? In
  23. (1986). Family care of the elderly: the role of public policy. doi
  24. (1997). Family Matters: Parents Living With Children In Old Age.
  25. (1994). Financing long-term care in Great Britain. doi
  26. (1991). Gender and Later Life: A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints. doi
  27. (1988). Gender, household composition and receipt of domiciliary services by elderly disabled people. doi
  28. (1998). Great expectations: social policy and the new millennium elders. In
  29. (1995). Health Expectancy and its Uses.
  30. (1992). Help in Old Age. Facing up to Change. A Longitudinal Network Study. doi
  31. (1998). Informal care of older people. In doi
  32. (1996). Informal care vs. formal services: changes in patterns of care over time. doi
  33. (1996). Issues in Informal Care. In OECD, Caring for Frail Elderly People: Policies in Evolution.
  34. (2000). London School of Economics, Welfare State Programme, WSP}26, London.Relying on informal care in the new century?
  35. (1996). Long-Term Care: Future Provision and Funding. Volume I,
  36. (1995). Love and money: the ®nancial consequences of caring for an older relative. In
  37. (1999). New estimates and projections of the population cohabiting in England and Wales. Population Trends,
  38. (1996). Paying for Long Term Care. Institute for Public Policy Research,
  39. (1991). Persons with Disabilities. Issues in Health Care Financing and Service Delivery. The Brookings Institution,
  40. (2000). Population of households in England to 2021. Population Trends,
  41. (1984). Public preferences for the care of dependency groups. doi
  42. (1990). Resources, Needs and Outcomes in Community-based Care. A Comparative Study of the Production of Welfare for Elderly People in Ten Local Authorities in England and Wales.
  43. (1995). Responsibilities, obligations and commitments. In
  44. (1999). Royal Commission on Long Term Care. doi
  45. (1994). Sharing the Burden: Strategies for Public and Private Long-Term Care Insurance. The Brookings Institution, doi
  46. (1999). Simulating social policy in an AGEing society.
  47. (1998). Survey of Care Homes for Elderly People: Final Report. Discussion Paper 1339}2. PSSRU,
  48. (1989). The Caring Relationship. Elderly People and Their Families. doi
  49. (1988). The Distribution of Domiciliary and Primary Health Care in Britain: Preliminary Results on Modelling Resource Allocation in the Welfare State.
  50. (1995). The Future of Family Care for Older People. doi
  51. (1998). The impact of the marital relationship on the experience of caring for an elderly spouse with dementia. doi
  52. (1990). The meaning of informal care: gender and the contribution of elderly people. doi
  53. (1990). The Needs of the Elderly in the st Century. Urban Institute Report 90±5.
  54. (2000). The NHS Plan. The Government's response to the Royal Commission on Long Term Care.C m4818-II. The Stationery Office: London.
  55. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. doi
  56. (1984). The Supportive Network. Coping with Old Age. George Allen and Unwin, doi
  57. (1987). The Use of Domiciliary Services by the Elderly: a Survey.
  58. (1991). Use of services in old age: data from three surveys of elderly people. doi
  59. (1986). Who cares for the elderly? Family care provision and receipt of statutory services.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.