Location of Repository

Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation?

By Eric Neumayer

Abstract

This article puts forward a number of arguments why trade openness might promote multilateral environmental cooperation. Most of these arguments are grounded in the substantive self-interest of the trading country. It tests the proposition using a range of proxy variables for general trade openness as well as specific export interests. The article examines whether countries open to trade are more likely to have signed three recent multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) and are more likely to have ratified early on another three agreements with quasi-universal membership. After controlling for income, political freedom and population size, the empirical estimations find some weak evidence in favour of a possible synergy between trade openness and multilateral environmental cooperation. World Trade Organisation membership as well as general export openness go hand in hand with greater willingness to participate in multilateral environmental cooperation in some cases. However, whether specific trade interests promote or hinder multilateral environmental cooperation depends on whether the relevant agreement is likely to threaten or accommodate the interests of exporting countries

Topics: JA Political science (General)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1111/1467-9701.00464
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:17882
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1776) [1979], An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Indianapolis: doi
  2. (1852) [1965]: Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, Books III-V and Appendices (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul). doi
  3. (2000). A Guide to Modern Econometrics (Chichester:
  4. (2000). Annual Surveys of Freedom Country Ratings 1972-73 to 1999-00
  5. (1994). Biodiversity Data Sourcebook (Cambridge: World Conservation Monitoring Centre).
  6. (2000). Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does it Take to be a Trading State?’, doi
  7. (2000). Economic Freedom of the World doi
  8. (1996). Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?’, doi
  9. Eméric (1623) [1909], The new Cyneas of Eméric Crucé doi
  10. Eric (2000), ‘Trade Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements and WTO Rules: Potential for Conflict, Scope for Reconciliation’,
  11. Eric (2002), ‘Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger Environmental Commitment? A Cross-country Analysis’, doi
  12. (2000). Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops, ISAAA Briefs No. 21 (Ithaca: International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech Applications).
  13. (2001). Greening Trade and Investment: Environmental Protection without Protectionism doi
  14. (2000). Human Development Report (Oxford: doi
  15. (1991). International Cooperation: the Environmental Experience’.
  16. (1997). Market Access, Competitiveness, and Harmonization: Environmental Protection in Regional Trade Agreements’,
  17. (1999). Production and Consumption of Ozone Depleting Substances 1986-1998 (Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme, Ozone Secretariat).
  18. (2000). Ratification of the 1992 Climate Change Convention: What Determines Legislative Delay?’,
  19. (2001). Social Indicators and Fixed Factors Database (Washington DC: World Bank).
  20. (2001). The doi
  21. (1996). The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-85’, doi
  22. (1997). The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good: the Case of Reduced CFC Emissions and the Montreal Protocol’, doi
  23. (2000). UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics on CD-Rom doi
  24. (2000). World Development Indicators on CD-Rom (Washington DC: doi
  25. (2000). World Fact Book (Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency).

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.