Location of Repository

Do we trust the data?: on the validity and reliability of cross-national environmental surveys

By Eric Neumayer

Abstract

This article provides evidence on the validity and reliability of cross-national environmental surveys, an aspect that has not found much attention so far. Methods. Validity can be checked in examining whether cross-national differences in environmental attitudes are in accordance with theoretical hypotheses. For example, a study can claim some validity if concern about inadequate sanitation is strongly negatively correlated with the actual extent of access to sanitation in a country. Results. Several validity checks were undertaken for the Gallup, Gallup, and Dunlap (1993) survey, all of which tend to support its validity. Next, the reliability of cross-national environmental surveys was checked. Both Pearson and Spearman rank correlations were run for similar questions from differing studies. Most correlations were low and statistically insignificant, however, thus putting some doubt on the reliability of cross-national environmental surveys, at least with respect to the questions examined. Conclusions. The findings support the validity of cross-national environmental surveys, but not their reliability. Future surveys should be designed such that validity and reliability checks become easier to undertake

Topics: GE Environmental Sciences
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Southwestern Social Science Association
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1111/1540-6237.00086
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:17880
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1999). Annual Survey of Freedom Country Scores 1972-73 to 1998-99. Washington D.C.: Freedom House. Online available at www.freedomhouse.org.
  2. (1998). Corruption Perceptions Index. Berlin: Transparency International. Online available from the Internet Centre for Corruption Research at www.gwdg.de/~uwvw. 12 UNDP,
  3. (1995). Global Concern for the Environment: Is Affluence a Prerequisite?” doi
  4. (1994). Global Environmentalism: A Challenge to the Postmaterialism Thesis?”
  5. (1998). Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook — Political, Religious, Sexual, and Economic Norms in 43 Societies: Findings from the 1990-1993 World Values Survey. Ann Arbor: doi
  6. (1993). Memorial Survey. doi
  7. (1997). Postmaterialist Values and the Environment:
  8. (1989). Public and Leadership Attitudes to the Environment in Four Continents: A Report of a Survey in 16 Countries, Conducted for the United Nations Environment Programme. Study No. 884002. New York: Louis Harris and Associates,
  9. (1995). Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values doi
  10. (1999). Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. doi
  11. (1998). World Development Indicators. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. doi
  12. (1996). World Development Report. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.