Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A new solution to the collective action problem: the paradox of voter turnout

By Satoshi Kanazawa

Abstract

Macy's work offers a potential solution to the paradox of voter turnout. The stochastic learning theory of voter turnout (Kanazawa 1998) posits that citizens perceive a correlation between their behavior (voting versus abstention) and the outcome of collective action (win versus loss for their candidate), and that they interpret the outcome as a reinforcer or a punisher. The theory can solve the paradox of voter turnout because now p, the probability that one's vote is or appears decisive, equals approximately .500 in the calculus-of-voting model (instead of p 0). I use General Social Survey data to test the theory. The empirical results indicate that citizens make their turnout decisions according to the "Win-Stay, Lose-Shift" pattern predicted by the stochastic learning theory, especially if there are no strong third-party candidates

Topics: JA Political science (General)
Publisher: American Sociological Association
Year: 2000
DOI identifier: 10.2307/2657465
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:17764
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.asanet.org/cs/root/... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/17764... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.