Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Digital divide or discursive design? On the emerging ethics of information space

By Nick Couldry
Topics: QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1023/A:1024916618904
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1999). Avoiding Politics. doi
  2. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. doi
  3. (1999). Can the “Next-Generation Internet” Effectively Support “Ordinary Citizens”? doi
  4. (1996). Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books, doi
  5. (1987). Communities of Discourse. doi
  6. (2001). Digital Divide. doi
  7. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease or Suplement Social Capital?
  8. (1990). Dryzek Discursive Democracy. doi
  9. (2001). From the Global Digital Divide to the Global Digital Opportunity. Report to the G-8 Kyushu-Okinawa Summit. Accessed from 1
  10. (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere. doi
  11. (2000). of Commerce. Falling Through the Net: towards digital inclusion – a report on Americans’ access to technology tools.
  12. (2002). Office of the e-Envoy.
  13. (2000). Office. Closing the Digital Divide: Information and Communication 16 Technologies in Deprived Areas.
  14. (2001). Organisation. Information and doi
  15. (2002). Primary Issues in Internet Use.
  16. (2001). Report of Joint OECD/ UN/ UNDP/ World Bank Global Forum, Exploiting the Digital Opportunities for Poverty Reduction. OECD,
  17. (1999).
  18. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastruture, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. doi
  19. (2002). The Broadband Difference, doi
  20. (2001). The Children’s Partnership, Online Context for Low-Income and Underserved Americans. Accessed from 7
  21. (1977). The Fall of Public Man. doi
  22. The Internet, 1995-2000: Access, Civic Involvement and Social Interaction. doi
  23. (2000). The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. doi
  24. (2002). The Real Digital Divide.
  25. (2001). Welcome to Cyberschool. Rowman and
  26. (1999). Which Equalities Matter? Polity: Cambridge, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.