Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Explaining government preferences for institutional change in EU foreign and security policy

By Mathias Koenig-Archibugi

Abstract

Some member-states of the European Union (EU) want a supranational foreign and security policy, while other member-states oppose any significant limitation of national sovereignty in this domain. What explains this variation? Answering this question could help us to better understand not only the trajectory of European unification, but also the conditions and prospects of consensual political integration in other regional contexts and territorial scales. The main research traditions in international relations theory suggest different explanations. I examine the roles of relative power capabilities, foreign policy interests, Europeanized identities, and domestic multilevel governance in determining the preferences of the fifteen EU member governments concerning the institutional depth of their foreign and security policy cooperation. I find that power capabilities and collective identities have a significant influence, but the effect of ideas about the nature and locus of sovereignty, as reflected in the domestic constitution of each country, is particularly remarkable

Topics: JX International law
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0020818304581055
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:16846
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). Social Politics in Context: The Institutional Politics Theory and Social Spending at the End of the New Deal+ doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.