Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Chronocentrism and British criminology

By Paul Rock

Abstract

Criminologists display a largely unexamined propensity to ignore writings that are more than fifteen or so years old, with evident consequences for the public presentation and validation of expert knowledge. A citation study was combined with detailed observations from British criminologists to ascertain quite how that disavowal of the past was accomplished

Topics: HM Sociology
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00078.x
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:15475
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford: doi
  2. (1956). Amnesia and New Columbuses’
  3. (1998). Changes In The Most-Cited Scholars doi
  4. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration, Cambridge: doi
  5. (2004). Criminal Woman, the Prostitute, and the Normal Woman, doi
  6. (1946). Forty-four Juvenile Thieves, doi
  7. (1998). Funes, His Memory’, in Fictions,
  8. (1993). Inventing Criminology; The Rise of ‘Homo Criminalis’, doi
  9. (1978). Literature Usage and Interrelationships in the Social Sciences as Shown by Citations in Monographs, London: Polytechnic of North London and
  10. (2002). Of Crimes and Criminals: The Development of Criminology
  11. (1995). Opinion and the World of Possibilities’, doi
  12. (1969). Processes of Imitation’
  13. (1963). Psychiatric Studies of Borstal Lads, doi
  14. (1939). Report on the Psychological Treatment of Crime, London: Home Office.
  15. (1967). Symbol, Reality, doi
  16. (2004). The Criminologists’ Gang’ doi
  17. (1969). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford: doi
  18. (1977). The Nude Beach,
  19. (1983). The Power to Punish, doi
  20. (1971). The Transcendent Character of Life’
  21. (1944). The Young Delinquent, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.