Location of Repository

Adolescent pedometer protocols : examining reactivity, tampering and participants' perceptions

By J.J. Scott, P.J. Morgan, R.C. Plotnikoff, S.G. Trost and D.R. Lubans

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate adolescents' potential reactivity and tampering while wearing pedometers by comparing different monitoring protocols to accelerometer output. The sample included adolescents (N=123, age range=14-15 years) from three secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomised to one of the three pedometer monitoring protocols: \ud \ud (i) daily sealed (DS) pedometer group, \ud \ud (ii) unsealed (US) pedometer group or \ud \ud (iii) weekly sealed (WS) pedometer group. \ud \ud Participants wore pedometers (Yamax Digi-Walker CW700, Yamax Corporation, Kumamoto City, Japan) and accelerometers (Actigraph GT3X+, Pensacola, USA) simultaneously for seven days. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine potential reactivity. Bivariate correlations between step counts and accelerometer output were calculated to explore potential tampering. The correlation between accelerometer output and pedometer steps/day was strongest among participants in the WS group (r=0.82, P <= 0.001), compared to the US (r=0.63, P <= 0.001) and DS (r=0.16, P=0.324) groups. The DS (P <= 0.001) and US (P=0.003), but not the WS (P=0.891), groups showed evidence of reactivity. The results suggest that reactivity and tampering does occur in adolescents and contrary to existing research, pedometer monitoring protocols may influence participant behaviour

Topics: reactivity, adolescents, pedometry, accelerometry, tampering, physical-activity levels, electronic pedometers, children, school, adults, accelerometer, accuracy, walking, intervention, education
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Group
Year: 2014
DOI identifier: 10.1080/02640414.2013.815361
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:71520
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://eprints.qut.edu.au/715... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.