Location of Repository

Reproductive technology, public policy and single motherhood

By Belinda Bennett

Abstract

In mid 2000, the Australian community engaged in a national debate over access to infertility treatment services. The debate was sparked by a Federal Court decision in late July. That decision, by Justice Sundberg in the case of McBain v State of Victoria 1 held that the provisions of the Infertility Treatment Act 1995 (Vic) which limited eligibility for infertility treatment to women who were married or in heterosexual de facto relationships, were inconsistent with section 22 of the Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of marital status. Justice Sundberg held that, by virtue of section 109 of the Constitution, 2 the provisions of the Victorian Act were inoperative to the extent of the inconsistency between the State and Commonwealth legislation

Publisher: Sydney University Law School
Year: 2000
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.qut.edu.au:71226
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/ (external link)
  • https://eprints.qut.edu.au/712... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.