Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A critique of the public/private dimension

By Christine Chinkin


The dualism between public and private spheres of action has been identified as a key feature of Western, liberal thought. Its normative consequences in domestic law have been much critiqued on both practical and theoretical grounds. The article examines how this same distinction operates in international law, <it>inter alia</it> through the principles of attribution for the purposes of state responsibility to delineate the reserved area from international intrusion. It questions whether the changing concept of the role of the state undermines the usefulness of the distinction and considers some of the strategies engaged for its avoidance, in particular within human rights jurisprudence

Topics: K Law (General)
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of European Journal of International Law
Year: 1999
DOI identifier: 10.1093/ejil
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.