Location of Repository

Mediation and alternative media, or relocating the centre of media and communication studies

By Nick Couldry


Alternative media should not be marginal, but central, to the developing agenda of media and communication studies, because they challenge the massive concentration of 'symbolic power' (Bourdieu) in mainstream media institutions and the resulting 'exclusion' of most people 'from the power of naming' (Melucci). Precisely because alternative media organisations, in relative terms, lack symbolic resources, their activities tend to be largely invisible, but that is no reason why, as 'weapons of the weak' (Scott), they should be ignored. With some exceptions, media studies has neglected alternative media for too long, and neglected also the inequalities of symbolic power in which media institutions themselves are involved. But now there is less excuse for that neglect. When the 'digital divide' and the atrophy of representative democracy are hotly debated not only by academics but also by policy-makers, media studies should listen to those who are not prepared to accept their exclusion from the power of naming; they are citizens with something important to contribute to debates about democracy, and in paying more attention to them, media studies can make an important link between its own agenda and urgent agendas in political theory and democratic debate

Topics: HE Transportation and Communications
Publisher: University of Queensland
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:7354
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles



  1. 1 For important discussion, see Giroux (2001). 2 It has been taken for granted in audience research on fan practices for more than a decade that dispersed practices of consumption must be taken seriously.
  2. (2000). 3 Which makes it all the more unfortunate that Garnham does not acknowledge any role for alternative media here
  3. (2000). A New Future for Communications.
  4. (1996). Challenging Codes. Cambridge: doi
  5. (1995). Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy’ doi
  6. (1993). Communication, Culture and Hegemony.
  7. (2000). Couldry is lecturer in media and communications at the London School of Economics where he is also director of the Masters programme in Media and Communications Regulation. He is the author of The Place of Media Power
  8. (1992). Dealing with difference: a politics of ideas, or a politics of presence?’ doi
  9. (1992). Democratic citizenship and the political community’ in C. Mouffe (ed) Dimensions of Radical Democracy. doi
  10. (1999). Disrupting the media frame at Greenham Common: a new chapter in the history of mediations?’, doi
  11. (2000). E-conomics. doi
  12. (2000). Emancipation, the Media and Modernity. doi
  13. (2001). Fissures in the Mediascape: An International Study of Citizens’
  14. (1995). Fugitive democracy’ in S. Benhabib (ed) Democracy and Difference.
  15. (1993). Homeless/ Global’ in J. Bird et al (eds) Mapping the Futures.
  16. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. doi
  17. (1994). Media Freedom: The Contradictions of Communication in the Age of Modernity. doi
  18. (1998). On Television and Journalism. doi
  19. (1992). On the subject of rights: pluralism, plurality and political identity’
  20. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: doi
  21. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. doi
  22. (1995). Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy’ doi
  23. (2000). Radical Internet Use’ in J. Downing Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks: Sage, doi
  24. (2000). Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks: doi
  25. (1984). Radical Media. doi
  26. (2000). Rethinking recognition’, doi
  27. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy’ in C. Calhoun (ed) Habermas and the Public Sphere. doi
  28. (1999). Rights and representations: public discourse and cultural citizenship’
  29. (1992). Situating the Self. doi
  30. (1983). Society of the Spectacle. doi
  31. (1995). Television Form and Public Address. doi
  32. (1998). The Air Waves: A Free Radio Handbook. Edinburgh and San Francisco:
  33. (1990). The Concept of Utopia. Syracuse: doi
  34. (1999). The Mouse that Roared. Rowman and Littlefield. 16 ---------
  35. (2000). The Place of Media Power: Pilgrims and Witnesses of the Media Age. doi
  36. (1974). The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion’, doi
  37. (1995). Three normative models of democracy’ doi
  38. (1995). Towards a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’
  39. (1999). Uses of Television. doi
  40. (1985). Weapons of the Weak. doi
  41. (1992). What revolutionary action means today’ in C. Mouffe (ed) Dimensions of Radical Democracy.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.