Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Suspicionless Searches: \u3cem\u3eU.S. v. King\u3c/em\u3e and the Ninth Circuit’s Dismissal of the Probationer-Parolee Distinction

By Tricia Nicholson


In U.S. v. King, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether a suspicionless search of a probationer, conducted pursuant to a condition of his probation, violated the Fourth Amendment. The Ninth Circuit held that the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment because legitimate governmental interests outweighed the probationer’s privacy interest. In conducting the balancing test, however, the court failed to give significance to the distinction between probationers and parolees for Fourth Amendment purposes and used an analysis that overrides any individual privacy interest that a probationer may have

Topics: Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Fourth Amendment, Law Enforcement and Corrections
Publisher: Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School
Year: 2014
OAI identifier:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.ed... (external link)
  • http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.ed... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.