Location of Repository

Myths about the lender of last resort

By C. A. E. Goodhart

Abstract

This topic has been prone to the accretion of myths that sometimes obscure the key issues. As a start, Bagehot is often treated as the first to write on the subject, ignoring Thornton's contribution. Next, Bagehot's proposal that such lending be at 'high' rates is incorrectly translated into 'penalty' rates. This paper, however, concentrates on and criticizes four further myths: that it is generally possible to distinguish between illiquidity and insolvency; that national LOLR capacities are unlimited, whereas international bodies, such as the IMF, cannot function as an ILOLR; that moral hazard is everywhere and at all times a major consideration; and that it might be possible to dispense with LOLR altogether

Topics: JC Political theory
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 1999
DOI identifier: 10.1111/1468-2362.00033
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:7146
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www3.interscience.wiley... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/7146/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.