Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Measuring the tail of the dog that doesn't bark in the night: the case of the national evaluation of Choose Life (the national strategy and action plan to prevent suicide in Scotland)

By Mhairi Mackenzie, Avril Blamey, Emma Halliday, Margaret Maxwell, Allyson McCollam, David McDaid, Joanne MacLean, Amy Woodhouse and Stephen Platt


Background Learning about the impact of public health policy presents significant challenges for evaluators. These include the nebulous and organic nature of interventions ensuing from policy directives, the tension between long-term goals and short-term interventions, the appropriateness of establishing control groups, and the problems of providing an economic perspective. An example of contemporary policy that has recently been subject to evaluation is the first phase of the innovative Scottish strategy for suicide prevention (Choose Life). Discussion and summary This paper discusses how challenges, such as those above, were made manifest within this programme. After a brief summary of the overarching approach taken to evaluating the first phase of Choose Life, this paper then offers a set of recommendations for policymakers and evaluators on how learning from a second phase might be augmented. These recommendations are likely to have general resonance across a range of policy evaluations as they move from early planning and implementation to more mature phases

Topics: HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-146
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). A: Issues in the economic evaluation of suicide prevention strategies: practical and methodological challenges London: Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science;
  2. (2006). Bauld L: Learning from Policy Failure. doi
  3. (2005). Blamey A: The practice and the theory: lessons from the application of a Theories of Change approach. Evaluation doi
  4. (1995). CH: New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Volume 1: concepts, methods and contexts Washington DC: The Aspen Institute;
  5. (2002). Choose Life: A National Strategy and Action Plan to Prevent Suicide in Scotland Edinburgh: The Stationery Office;
  6. (2006). D: In defense of the randomised controlled trial for health promotion research. doi
  7. (2006). Developing a stakeholder driven anticipated timeline of impact for evaluation of social programs. doi
  8. (1992). Discounting in health care decision-making: time for a change?
  9. (2005). Economic appraisal pf public health interventions. Briefing Paper London: Health Development Agency;
  10. (2006). Economic Evaluation and Public Health Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government Health Promotion Division;
  11. (2003). Economic Evaluation in the Social Welfare Field: Making Ends Meet. Evaluation doi
  12. (1998). eds: New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Volume 2: theory, measurement, and analysis Washington DC: The Aspen Institute;
  13. (2001). Effects of change in legislation on pack size of paracetamol and salicylate on self-poisoning in the United Kingdom: before and after study. BMJ doi
  14. (2001). Evaluating complex policies: shat have we learned from total purchasing?
  15. (2003). Evidence, understanding and complexity: evaluation in non-linear systems. Evaluation doi
  16. (1998). Experimentation and social interventions: a forgotten but important history. doi
  17. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ
  18. (2004). Getting evidence into practice: perspectives on rationality. Evaluation doi
  19. (1998). Have targets improved performance in the English NHS? BMJ doi
  20. Health Action Zones: partnerships for health equity London: doi
  21. (2006). Health Inequalities: a challenge for Europe London: Department of Health;
  22. (2005). Hendin H: Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. doi
  23. (1999). I: Evaluating public policy experiments: measuring outcomes, monitoring processes or managing pilots? Evaluation doi
  24. (2003). Improving Health in Scotland – The Challenge Edinburgh: The Stationery Office;
  25. Legislation restricting paracetamol sales and patterns of self-harm and death resulting from paracetamol-containing preparations in Scotland. doi
  26. (2002). Matka E: Building collaborative capacity through "theories of change": early lessons from the evaluation of Health Action Zones in England. Evaluation doi
  27. (1997). Prevention, policy, and paradox: what is the value of future health?
  28. (2005). Promoting social change: the experience of Health Action Zones in England. doi
  29. (2004). Securing good health for the whole population Norwich: Stationery Office;
  30. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society doi
  31. The relation of nonfatal suicide attempts to completed suicides.
  32. Tilley N: Realistic evaluation London: doi
  33. (2006). Using and generating evidence: policy makers' reflections on commissioning and learning from the Scottish Health Demonstration Projects. Evidence & Policy doi
  34. (2001). Using evidence to inform health policy: case study. doi
  35. (1999). Whether a sociologist, economist, psychologist or simply a skilled evaluator: lessons from evaluation practice in the United States. Evaluation doi
  36. (2006). Woodhouse A: Evaluation of the first phase of Choose Life: the National Strategy and Action Plan to Prevent Suicide in Scotland doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.