Location of Repository

Alternatives to fundholding

By Howard Glennerster, Anna Cohen and Virginia Bovell

Abstract

The new Labour government in the United Kingdom is proposing to adapt the reforms begun by the last Thatcher government. In particular, it is proposing to abolish the most controversial element—general practitioner (GP) fundholding. It is looking for alternatives. The study reported here followed and evaluated several such schemes. While fundholders use their purchasing power directly to force change by threatening "exit" to another provider, other GPs have evolved ways of influencing decisions—enhancing their "voice." The authors develop a theory to predict the conditions favoring the relative success of exit and voice strategies in health purchasing, and describe alternative GP-based purchasing schemes and the reasons they evolved in six sample districts. In four of these districts and eight practices in each, fundholding and non-fundholding GPs were then asked to describe their intentions and the outcomes of the purchasing process in which they had participated. Four specialties were taken as examples. The authors compare the relative success of fundholders and non-fundholders in achieving their objectives

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HJ Public Finance, HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Baywood Publishing Co., Inc.
Year: 1998
DOI identifier: 10.2190/E5MT-HHGH-5AAA-RC1X
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:5248
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • https://www.baywood.com/journa... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/5248/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.