Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Do players correctly estimate what others do?: Evidence of conservatism in beliefs

By Steffan Huck and Georg Weizsacker

Abstract

n a simple experimental environment a group of subjects was asked to give estimates of a second group’s choice frequencies in a set of lottery-choice tasks. The results show that subjects in the first group are on average able to correctly predict the option that is chosen with higher frequency by the second group, but the predictions are systematically inaccurate in that they are distorted toward the uniform prior. Two mechanisms to elicit the expectations were used in the experiment, a quadratic scoring rule and a bidding mechanism. Aggregate results being similar under both mechanisms, the use of the former mechanism consistently yields more accurate predictions

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2002
DOI identifier: 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00170-6
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:4943
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.sciencedirect.com/s... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/4943/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.