Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Unravelling Osman

By Conor Gearty

Abstract

The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Osman v United Kingdom, decided in October 1998, has proved very controversial. Its implications for the UK law of negligence appear to be immense. Not the least of the complexities associated with the decision is the widespread perception that the reasoning of the Court is extremely difficult to understand, indeed, that it is at times contradictory. This article subjects the Osman judgment to close analysis. It explains the Court's approach to Article 6(1) by reference to the way in which the Strasbourg court has over many years developed its case law on this provision. The article includes an overview of the way in which, so far, the decision has been deployed in UK law. The author suggests that, whatever about the actual result of the case, the reasoning of the European Court in Osman is deeply flawed, and that the UK judiciary should be mindful of this fact when considering its deployment in domestic law

Topics: JC Political theory, K Law (General)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2001
DOI identifier: 10.1111/1468-2230.00315
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:4622
Provided by: LSE Research Online
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.modernlawreview.co.... (external link)
  • http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/4622/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.