Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Coordinating tasks in M-form and U-form organisations

By Yingyi Qian, Gerard Roland and Cheng-Gang Xu


We model the coordination of specialised tasks inside an organisation as "attribute matching". Using this method, we compare the performance of organisational forms (M-form and U-form) in implementing changes such as innovation and reform. In our framework, organisational forms affect the information structure of an organisation and thus the way to coordinate changes. Compared to the U-form, the M-form organisation achieves better coordination but suffers from fewer economies of scale. The distinctive advantage of the M-form is flexibility of experimentation, which allows the organisation to introduce more innovation and reform. The theory is illustrated by the organisational differences between China and the former Soviet Union and sheds light on their different reform strategies, particularly with regard to the prevalence of the experimental approach in China

Topics: HB Economic Theory, HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles


  1. (1995). [39] Xinhui Xianzhi Editorial Committee, Xinhui Xianzhi (Annals of Xinhui County:,
  2. (1997). [40] Xinhui Xianzhi Editorial Committee, Xinhui Xianzhi Xubian (Annals of Xinhui County — Continuation:,
  3. (1972). 1The team theory literature includes, among others, Marschak and Radner
  4. (1994). 30or state-owned farm employees did not want to become private farmers
  5. (1995). 3Information on Xinhui County is from Annals of Xinhui County
  6. A Partial Theory of the Optimal Organization of Bureaucracy.” doi
  7. (1998). Agriculture andt h eS t a t ei nS o v i e ta n dP o s t - S o v i e t
  8. (1996). Aleksandr Petrikov and Vasilii Uzun. “Arigultural Reform in Russia: A view from the Farm Level” World Bank Discussion Paper Number 327, doi
  9. are grateful to doi
  10. (2002). Changes in Agricultural Markets in Transition Economies”,
  11. (1990). Chinese State Enterprises: A Regional Property Rights Analysis. Chicago:
  12. (1989). Comparative Economic Systems, third edition.
  13. (1972). Economic Theory of Teams. doi
  14. (1994). Firms as doi
  15. Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in doi
  16. (1986). Horizontal vs. doi
  17. (1992). How to Reform a Planned Economy: Lessons from China.” doi
  18. (1988). Integrated Management in Chinese Fishery: Some Models,”
  19. (1997). Kolkhozy, the Russian Achilles Heel: Failed Agrarian Reform.” Europe-Asia Studies, doi
  20. (1988). Laboratories of Democracy.
  21. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies, doi
  22. (1989). Planning in China and the Soviet Union. Before the reform, both China and the Soviet Union were centrally planned economies. The organization of the Soviet economy was the classical textbook case of central planning (Gregory and Stuart,
  23. Price vs. doi
  24. (1995). Product and Process Flexibility in an Innovative Environment.” doi
  25. (1993). Russian Agriculture between Plan and Market,”
  26. (1995). some formal studies on the M-form and the U-form organizations have been undertaken. Aghion and Tirole
  27. (1962). Strategy and Structure. doi
  28. (1901). The American Commonwealth, London: Macmillan (first published in 1888),
  29. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, doi
  30. (1962). The notion of M-form and U-form organizations was pioneered by the influential works of Chandler and
  31. (1993). The Return of Individual Farming in Russia,”
  32. (1992). The Socialist System. doi
  33. (1980). The Soviet Economic System, second edition. doi
  34. (2003). The Suntory Centre Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines London doi
  35. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in doi
  36. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. doi
  37. Understanding China’s Economic Performance.” doi
  38. (1992). Verlustminderung als zentrale Aufgabe der Nahrungswirtschaft
  39. (1993). Why China’s Economic Reform Differ: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.