Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Decision support for the differential diagnosis of jaundice

By R.W. (Robert) Segaar

Abstract

Making a diagnosis is always a challenge for the clinician who faces a\ud jaundiced patient. A diagnosis provides a basis for prognosis, and guides\ud therapeutic action. Modeling of the diagnostic process provides an understanding\ud of the contributing elements. In addition, diagnostic models can be\ud applied to real world situations. This can be useful when the model supports\ud or complements the clinician on particular tasks. In that way, the diagnostic\ud model becomes a diagnostic aid. Computers can often be successfully used\ud to implement diagnostic models, hence the term 'computer assisted diagnosis'.\ud The performance of diagnostic aids is always an important issue. Most\ud diagnostic aids are developed at one place, whereas they are used at an\ud other place. In the development of diagnostic models, one often models\ud features that are characteristic to the local patient population. These features\ud may be different for patients elsewhere. There is a chance that there will be\ud a decline in performance of the diagnostic aids due to these differences, and\ud that adjustment procedures are required. These are the crucial questions\ud addressed in this thesis.\ud The symptom jaundice is a good starting point to model diagnostic\ud processes. There is a reasonable consensus regarding the diagnostic\ud categories. Diseases underlying jaundice can have serious consequences\ud for the patient. Jaundice also is a relatively frequent symptom. These\ud properties, together with practical, historical and organizational motives\ud explain our choice of jaundice.\ud Two retrospective data collections on jaundiced patients admitted to the\ud department of Internal Medicine of Dijkzigt hospital are used throughout this\ud thesis. A first series included 100 patients, whereas a second contained 214\ud patients. With these data collections at hand, we could answer the questions\ud formulated. Especially the second data collection provided detailed information\ud on the diagnostic parameters of the patients. There we also recorded\ud the referral patterns. These data confirm that Dijkzigt hospital operates as\ud a hospital with many secondary and tertiary referrals. The implementation\ud of the data collections will be outlined in chapter 2, whereas chapter 3 present\ud some background data on the patient populations

Topics: medical decision making, diagnostic models, jaundice
Year: 1991
OAI identifier: oai:repub.eur.nl:50741

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.