Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

New rules in the workplace: Applying object-relations theory to explain problem Internet and email behaviour in the workplace

By Monica T. Whitty and Adrian N. Carr

Abstract

While the Internet and email can be great assets to an organisation, especially in respect to creating new knowledge, nonetheless a number of problems have accompanied the introduction of the Internet into the workplace. Some of these problems include: ‘cyberslacking’, cyber-harassment and ‘Netiquette’. Employers have attempted to obviate these problems by developing Internet usage policies, implementing filtering software and monitoring their workers. It has also been suggested that psychological tests could assist employers in identifying potentially ‘problem’ employees. Although each of these methods have their uses, none of them have been successful in dealing with such problems. We argue that if we are better able to conceptualise cyberspace and the relationship workers have with this space, then we may be able to develop more effective solutions to deal with these new problems in the workplace. This paper attempts to do just that, by drawing upon object-relations theories, developed by Winnicott, Bollas and Klein. We also draw upon Serres’ work on quasi-objects. We believe that cyberspace is a unique and important tool for organisations to utilise, but if not understood well, the existing problems that have already emerged, and those yet to emerge, will continue to be ineffectively addressed.Peer-reviewedPost-prin

Topics: Internet, workplace, organisations, object-relations, Winnicott, Klein, Bollas, Serres, surveillance, cyberslacking, cyber-harassment, netiquette
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2004
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.005
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/10021
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1994). Age influence on attitudes of office workers faced with new computerized technologies: A questionnaire analysis. doi
  2. (1995). Angels: A modern myth
  3. (1992). Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self-experience. doi
  4. (1989). Computer technology and knowledge workers: A pilot study of job impact. doi
  5. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. doi
  6. (1997). Cyber Angels homepage.
  7. (2003). Cyber-flirting: Playing at love on the Internet. Theory and Psychology, doi
  8. (2001). Cyberslacking: Internet abuse in the workplace. doi
  9. (1992). From Klein to Kristeva: Psychoanalytic feminism and the search for the "good enough" mother. doi
  10. (2002). Hot off the net.
  11. (2004). in press). Transitional and quasi-objects in organization studies: Viewing Enron from the object relations world of Winnicott and Serres. doi
  12. (2002). Lost in cyberspace: The web @ work. doi
  13. (1975). Love, guilt and reparation and othe works,
  14. (2000). Male, female, email: The struggle for relatedness in a paranoid society. doi
  15. (2001). Managing in knowledge-based competition. United Kingdom: doi
  16. (1985). New introductory letures on psychoanalysis
  17. (2001). Organisational and administrative play: The potential of magic realism, surrealism and postmodernist forms of play.
  18. (1990). Other times, other realities: Toward a theory of psychoanalytic treatment. doi
  19. (2003). Qualitative results for the Internet and email in the workplace survey.
  20. (2004). Should filtering software be utilised in the workplace. Australian employees_ attitudes towards Internet usage and surveillance of the Internet in the workplace.
  21. (1995). The Embodied Computer/User. doi
  22. (1996). The price of admission: harassment and free speech in the wild, wild west. In
  23. (1986). The selected Melanie Klein. doi
  24. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. doi
  25. (2001). The year
  26. (1977). Three essays on sexuality doi
  27. (2002). Validation of a new scale for measuring problematic Internet use: Implications for pre-employment screening. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.