Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Would I lie to you? Self-serving lies and other-oriented lies told across different media

By Monica T. Whitty and Siobhan E Carville

Abstract

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computers in Human Behavior. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 2008, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.004This study set out to investigate the type of media individuals are more likely to tell self-serving and other-oriented lies, and whether this varied according to the target of the lie. One hundred and fifty participants rated on a likert-point scale how likely they would tell a lie. Participants were more likely to tell self-serving lies to people not well-known to them. They were more likely to tell self-serving lies in email, followed by phone, and finally face-to-face. Participants were more likely to tell other-oriented lies to individuals they felt close to and this did not vary according to the type media. Participants were more likely to tell harsh truths to people not well-known to them via email.Peer-reviewedPost-prin

Topics: lies, deception, media, internet, other-oriented lie, self-serving lie, DECEPTION, INTERNET, ONLINE
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.004
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/10014
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1959). (1959/1997). In The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. In
  2. (2005). Cooperation of liars and truth tellers. doi
  3. (2006). Cyberspace Romance: The psychology of online relationships.
  4. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour. doi
  5. (1998). Eveyday lies in close and casual relationships.
  6. (2002). Liar, liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in Chat Rooms. doi
  7. (2001). Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. doi
  8. (1996). Lying in everyday life. doi
  9. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation and emotion. doi
  10. (2005). Pathological lying revisited.
  11. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. doi
  12. (2001). Sexual lying among college students in close and casual relationships. doi
  13. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. doi
  14. (2005). Storming and Forming a Normative Response to a Deception Revealed Online. doi
  15. (2005). Types of deception and underlying motivation: What people think. doi
  16. (1984). White lies in interpersonal communication: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations. doi
  17. (1996). Who lies? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.