Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Prospects for knowledge exchange in health policy and management: institutional and epistemic boundaries

By Graham P. Martin, Graeme Currie and Andy Lockett


This is the final draft, after peer-review, of a manuscript published in RSM journals: There have been calls for greater exchange between research and practice in health care policy and management, but little empirical research on what commissioners of research and researchers themselves consider appropriate, good quality research knowledge. This paper addresses this gap, considering the views of commissioners and producers of policy and management research in health care and other fields. \ud \ud Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 18 commissioners and producers of research, in central government, the NHS and other commissioning organizations, and in universities and independent sector providers. \ud \ud Results: Commissioners and producers agreed that research often fails to fulfil policy-makers’ and managers’ needs, and that greater interaction is required to improve this relationship. However, they offered differing accounts of the nature of research knowledge (as a ‘product’ or a ‘mindset’), and of what constitutes value, validity and originality in research, reflecting the differing priorities and pressures faced by the two groups. \ud \ud Conclusions: Efforts to promote greater interaction between research, policy and practice, and more critical, reflexive engagement between policy-makers, managers and researchers, are likely to face significant obstacles given these competing constructions of research knowledge and their reinforcement by divergent priorities.Peer-reviewedPost-prin

Publisher: Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010132
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. Convergent evolution: the academic and policy roots of collaborative research. doi
  2. (2001). Evidence-based management: from theory to practice in health care. Milbank Quarterly. doi
  3. (2011). Evidence-based management: the very idea. Public doi
  4. Evidence-based policy and practice: riding for a fall? doi
  5. From guidance to practice: Why NICE is not enough. doi
  6. (2009). Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evidence & Policy. doi
  7. Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of Mode 2 knowledge production in management. doi
  8. Mode 2” revisited: the new production of knowledge.
  9. (2001). Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society. doi
  10. New Labour, modernisation and the medical labour process. doi
  11. Novel mode of knowledge production? Producers and consumers in health services research. doi
  12. Promoting evidence-based practice: models and mechanisms from cross-sector review. doi
  13. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. doi
  14. Reflexive evaluation of an academic-industry research collaboration: can Mode 2 management research be achieved? doi
  15. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. doi
  16. Sharing and expanding academic and practitioner knowledge in health care. doi
  17. The impact of institutional forces upon knowledge sharing in the UK NHS: the triumph of professional power and the inconsistency of policy. Public Administration. doi
  18. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review. doi
  19. The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. doi
  20. (2009). Tomorrow‟s doctors. doi
  21. Using “linkage and exchange” to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Affairs. doi
  22. (2007). Using evidence. doi
  23. Why “knowledge transfer” is misconceived for applied social research. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.