Location of Repository

Examining the Blaming of Rape Victims and Perpetrators: Rape Myths, Belief in a Just World, Gender Role Beliefs, and Applied Findings

By Emma Ruth Sleath


Interest in research on victim blaming has remained significant since it came to the fore in the 1970s. Victim blaming, of both male and female victims of rape, is central to this thesis in understanding the contribution to this of a number of motivational beliefs and stereotypes (i.e., rape myth acceptance, belief in a just world, and gender role traits/beliefs). As well as this, this thesis develops some understanding of rape perpetrator blaming, broadening the focus of research away from the victim. Most of all, this thesis seeks to increase the understanding of police attitudes concerning rape victims and the influence of specialist police training and experience in dealing with rape victims. In a series of studies, vignette scenarios were given to 558 students, 101 non-students, and 157 police officers to assess their blaming attitudes towards the rape victim (male and/or female) and perpetrator (male). These studies found a lack of consistent gender effects in blaming but a strong consistent relationship between rape myth acceptance and victim blaming. Belief in a just world and gender role traits/beliefs demonstrated little effect on rape victim and perpetrator blaming. In the police officers sample, job experience and receiving specialist training to deal with rape victims did not affect the levels of blaming engaged in. This thesis has important implications for policy and criminal justice systems and the findings are discussed in the context of these

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9897

Suggested articles



  1. (1989). A comparison of androgynous, masculine sex-typed, and undifferentiated males on dimensions of attitudes toward rape. doi
  2. (1975). A short version of the attitudes towards women scale (AWS). doi
  3. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. doi
  4. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. doi
  5. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical re-examination. doi
  6. (2002). Attrbution of rape as a function of victim gender and sexuality, and perceived similarity to the victim. doi
  7. (2008). Attribution of blame in cases of rape: An analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim. Aggression and Violent Behavior, doi
  8. (2004). Attributions of blame in sexual assault to perpetrators and victims of both genders. doi
  9. (2008). Attributions of responsibility for rape: Differences across familiarity of situation, gender, and acceptance of rape myths. doi
  10. (1999). Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure and trauma in male rape. doi
  11. (1999). Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure, and trauma in male rape. doi
  12. (1973). Belief in a just world and reactions to another’s lot. doi
  13. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. doi
  14. (1999). Belief in male rape myths: A test of two competing theories (Doctoral dissertation,
  15. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory: Professional manual. doi
  16. (2004). Beyond belief? Police, rape and women's credibility. doi
  17. (1998). Call for research into male rape.
  18. (1999). Characteriological and behavioural blame in conversations about female and male rape. doi
  19. (1993). Child Psychology: A Contemporary Viewpoint.
  20. (1996). Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date rape supportive attitudes and sexual aggression in dating situations. doi
  21. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd edition). doi
  22. (2000). Does “no” really mean “no” after you say “yes”? Attributions about date and marital rape. doi
  23. (2000). Does "no" really mean "no" after you say "yes"? Attributions about date and marital rape. doi
  24. (2003). Effects of gender and sexuality on judgements of victim blame and rape myth acceptance in a depicted male rape. doi
  25. (2006). Effects of perpetrator gender and victim sexuality on blame towards male victims of sexual assault. doi
  26. (2005). Effects of rape on men: A descriptive analysis. doi
  27. (1994). Effects of victim gender and physical vs. psychological trauma/injury on observers‟ perceptions of sexual assault and its aftereffects. doi
  28. (2003). Effects of victim gender and sexuality on attributions of blame to rape victims.
  29. (1998). Evaluation in Counseling and Development, doi
  30. (1990). Evaluation of rape victim by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. doi
  31. (1994). Gay men as victims of non-consensual sex. doi
  32. (1993). Gender differences in attributions of blame for male rape victims. doi
  33. (1999). Gender differences in rape reporting.
  34. (2002). Gender differences in victim and crime characteristics of sexual assaults. doi
  35. (2005). Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of male rape myth acceptance. doi
  36. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen (Belief in a just world as motive: Validity correlates of two scales).
  37. (2008). I have heard horrible stories..." Rape victim advocates' perceptions of the revictimization of rape victims by the police and medical system. doi
  38. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes towards rape: A meta-analytical review. doi
  39. (2002). Introduction: Psychology and the internet. doi
  40. (1985). Just world beliefs in an unjust society: A cross cultural comparison. doi
  41. (2004). Making sense of male rape: Constructions of gender, sexuality and experience of rape victims. doi
  42. (1997). Male on male rape. doi
  43. (2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. doi
  44. (2004). Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming Emma Sleath and Ray Bull University of Leicester Address Correspondence To: Emma Sleath, doi
  45. (1980). Male rape: Offenders and victims. doi
  46. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. doi
  47. (2000). Male victims of sexual assault (2nd Ed.) Oxford: doi
  48. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A re-evaluation using the Bem Sex Role Inventory.
  49. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. doi
  50. (2004). On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociocultural scope of theorising about gender development and functioning: comment on doi
  51. (2001). Perceived motivation for rape: Gender differences in beliefs about female and male rape.
  52. (2006). Perceptions of male victims in depicted sexual assaults: A review of the literature. doi
  53. (1998). Perceptions of rape based on sex and sexual orientation of the victim.
  54. (2003). Personality, values and belief in a just world. doi
  55. (1991). Police officers' definitions of rape: A prototype study. doi
  56. (1991). Police officers‟ definitions of rape: A prototype study. doi
  57. (1975). Police processing of rape complaints: A case study.
  58. (2003). Rape and seduction script of university students: Implications for rape attributions and unacknowledged rape.
  59. (1997). Rape myth acceptance and sociodemographic characteristics: A multidimensional analysis.
  60. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. doi
  61. (2006). Rape myths and social distance toward sex offenders and victims among therapists and students. Sex Roles, doi
  62. (2007). Rape perception and the function of ambivalent sexism and genderrole traditionality. doi
  63. (1999). Rape perceptions as a function of gender-role traditionality and victim-perpetrator association.
  64. (2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victimperpetrator acquaintance. doi
  65. (2009). Rape reporting after reforms: Have times really changed?
  66. (1987). Reactions to stranger and acquaintance rape.
  67. (1987). Real rape. doi
  68. (2000). Retrieved from http://brm.psychonomic-journals.org/content/by/year
  69. (1993). Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale manual. Sigma Assesment Systems, Inc: Port Huron.
  70. (1997). Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: Development, psychometric properties, and recommendations for future research. doi
  71. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, doi
  72. (1997). Sexually assaulted males: 115 men consulting a counselling service.
  73. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, doi
  74. (1996). Social reactions, coping strategies, and self-blame attributions in adjustment to sexual assault. doi
  75. (1984). Societal influences on attribution: Blaming some victims more than others. doi
  76. (1992). Sphere-specific just world beliefs and attitudes to AIDS. doi
  77. (1984). The 'normal' victim: The effects of gender stereotypes on reactions to victims. doi
  78. (1988). The Attitudes towards Rape Victims Scale: Construction, validation and cross-cultural applicability. doi
  79. (1980). The belief in a just world. doi
  80. (2006). The case of the guilty victim: The effects of gender of victim and gender of perpetrator on attributions of blame and responsibility. doi
  81. (2001). The effects of belief in a just world and victim's innocence on secondary victimisation, judgements of justice and deservingness.
  82. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. doi
  83. (2002). The help-seeking decisions of violent crime victims: An examination of the direct and conditional effects of gender and the victim-offender relationship. doi
  84. (2001). The influence of victim gender and sexual orientation on judgements of the victim in a depicted stranger rape. Violence and Victims,
  85. (1995). The just world, charitable giving and attitudes towards disability. doi
  86. (2000). The prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization among homosexual men. doi
  87. (1989). The relationship between gender-related traits and attitudes. doi
  88. (2000). The role of political ideology in mediating judgements of blame in rape victims and their assailants: A test of the just world, personal responsibility and legitimization hypotheses. doi
  89. (1984). The Sex Role Egalitarianism Scale: A measure of attitudes towards equality between the sexes. doi
  90. (1998). The structure of rape attitudes for men and women: A three-factor model. doi
  91. (1992). Traditional and nontraditional women's attributions of responsibility to physically resistive and non-resistive rape victims. doi
  92. (2003). Turkish university students’ attitudes toward rape. doi
  93. (2003). Turkish university students‟ attitudes toward rape. doi
  94. (2005). Using multivariate statistics (5th edition).
  95. Victims and perpetrators of male sexual assault. doi
  96. (2004). Was it rape? The function of women’s rape myth acceptance and definitions of sex in labelling their own experiences. doi
  97. (2007). Without Consent: A report on the joint review of the investigation and prosecution of rape offences. London: Home Office.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.