Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Group Dynamics in Problem-Based Learning (PBL): A Case Study of Architectural Students in a Hong Kong University

By Joseph Francis Wong

Abstract

This thesis investigates the individual and group behaviour of students in Hong Kong who are experiencing a Problem-Based Learning (PBL) curriculum for the first time.\ud The research examines how they cope with problems arising from small group collaborative learning and factors influencing their group dynamics in a PBL setting. The central research question is, “How does a group of university students in a Hong Kong cope with the group dynamics, both inside and outside the classroom, when experiencing a PBL situation in their programme?” Following an interpretivist paradigm, this study aims to develop a substantive theory of the interaction among university students in a PBL tutorial environment and associated phenomena. This research has employed the qualitative approach of grounded theory research methods to collect and analyse data from twelve first year students studying in the Associate of Science in Architectural Studies programme at the City University of Hong Kong. Data collected from semi-structured interviews, non-participant video-taped observations, and documents were triangulated to enhance the rigour of the study. The Theory of Adaptive Formation that has emerged from this study explains the interactive processes that determine student behaviour and group dynamics in the PBL small group collaborative learning setting and describes the phenomenon of constant formation and re-formation adopted by the students and tutorial groups to adapt to different situations arising from the PBL process under the influence of four key factors: Group members, Problem brief, Tutor influence and Group collaboration. The theory also explains the relationship between the four student types –Drivers, Adventurers, Workers and Riders – and the key factors. Although the emergent theory remains predominantly substantive in nature, this study illuminates important implications for the stakeholders as well as highlights critical recommendations for practitioners and researchers of PBL

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9667

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). A new teamwork-based PBL problem design for electrical and electronic engineering education: A systems approach”
  2. (1990). Acts of meaning.
  3. (2005). Adding problem-based learning tutorials to a traditional lecture-based curriculum: a pilot study in a dental school” in Odontology.
  4. (2004). An evaluation of gender differences on the Belbin Team Role Self-Perception Inventory”
  5. (2002). Analysing narratives and documents”
  6. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley:
  7. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed). Newbury Park:
  8. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed). Newbury Park:
  9. (2005). Becoming a tutor: exploring the learning experiences and needs of novice tutors in a PBL programme” in Medical teacher.
  10. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction.
  11. (2000). Becoming self-directed learners: strategy development in problem-based learning”
  12. (1996). Breakthrough teamwork: outstanding results using structured teamwork.
  13. (1996). Building community: A new future for architecture education and practice. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Learning.
  14. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation” in
  15. (2000). Cognition, metacognition, and problem-based learning” in
  16. (2004). Collaboration, dialogue and critical openness through PBL”
  17. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research”
  18. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.
  19. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry”
  20. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement”
  21. (2009). Creativity and group dynamics in a problem-based learning context” in
  22. (2002). Cross-cultural differences in interpreting and doing research” in
  23. (2002). Developing and supporting creative problem solving teams:
  24. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker” in
  25. (1988). Educational research, methodology, and measurement: an international handbook.
  26. (2003). Educational research: An introduction.
  27. (2003). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed). Columbus:
  28. (2004). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (2nd ed).
  29. (2004). Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research (2nd ed).
  30. (2008). Electrical engineering students evaluate problem-based learning (PBL)”
  31. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: a review of the literature” in
  32. (2003). Facilitating problem-based learning: Illuminating perspectives.
  33. (2009). Facilitating problem-solving processes for adaptors and innovators”
  34. (1996). Facilitation, GSS, and training as sources of process restictiveness and guidance for structured group decision making: an empirical assessment” in Information system research.
  35. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: A review of research”
  36. (1997). Forms of understanding: Thematic knowledge and the Modernist legacy” in
  37. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning.
  38. (1995). Fractures and breaks”
  39. (2001). Grounded theory in management research.
  40. (2002). Grounded theory: a practical guide for management, business and market researchers.
  41. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: guidelines for qualitative inquiry. San Diego:
  42. (1994). Group dynamics: understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning” in Collaborative learning: Underlying processes and effective techniques.
  43. (2003). Group problems in problem-based learning”
  44. (2000). How are we doing? Methods of assessing group processing in a problem-based learning context”
  45. (2001). I don‟t want to be a groupie” in
  46. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning for administrators.
  47. (1996). Implementing problem-based learning in a master‟s degree program in education administration”
  48. (1994). Influence of a highly focused case on the effect of small-group process and on student performance”
  49. (2005). Influence of team composition and task complexity on team performance”
  50. (1989). Interpretive interactionism.
  51. (1994). Interviewing: the art of science”
  52. (2002). Introduction to educational research.
  53. (2000). Introduction to research methods. Thousand Oaks:
  54. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative & qualitative analysis.
  55. (1994). Introduction: entering the field of qualitative research”
  56. (1969). Issues in participant observation: A text and reader.
  57. (2004). Learning leadership through collaboration: the intersection of leadership and group dynamics in problem-based learning”
  58. (2001). Mixing social inquiry methodologies” in
  59. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park:
  60. (1999). Negotiating teams in industrial relations”
  61. (1991). Nursing research: Principles and methods.
  62. (2002). Observation and interviewing: options and choices in qualitative research”
  63. (1994). Observation Techniques”
  64. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge:
  65. (2000). Observing self-directed learners in a problem-based learning context: two case studies”
  66. (1995). Orientation to self-directed learning: paradox or paradigm”
  67. (2003). PBL in Asian medical schools and students‟ perceptions of their experience”
  68. (1998). Perceptions of group dynamics in problem-based learning sessions: a time to reflect on group issues”
  69. (2002). Predicting team performance from a learning process model”
  70. (2007). Problem based learning in an MSW programme: A study of learning outcomes”
  71. (2003). Problem based learning”
  72. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education (Rev.
  73. (2009). Problem-based learning communities” in
  74. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories.
  75. (1992). Problem-based learning in leadership development.
  76. (2000). Problem-based Learning: A research perspective on learning interactions. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  77. (2004). Problem-based learning: an integration of theory and field”
  78. (1994). Problem-based learning: how to gain the most from
  79. (2004). Promoting student learning through a student-centred problem-based learning subject curriculum”
  80. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge:
  81. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research.
  82. (1995). Qualitative research: observation methods in health care settings”
  83. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
  84. (1999). Reconsidering logical positivism. Cambridge:
  85. (2004). Research and change in the real world.
  86. (1993). Research in education: A conceptual introduction.
  87. (1993). Research methods: researching peers and familiar settings”
  88. (1994). Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research”
  89. (1958). Roles in sociological field investigation” in Social forces.
  90. (1997). Skills to enhance problem-based learning”
  91. (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks:
  92. (2002). Social research: Issues, methods and process (3rd ed).
  93. (1988). Structured observation techniques” in
  94. (2004). Students' experiences in problem-based learning: three blind mice episode or educational innovation”
  95. (2007). Teacher education students‟ reflection on how problem-based learning has changed their mental models about teaching and learning”
  96. (1995). Team building: Current issues and new alternatives.
  97. (1999). Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study” in The journal of management development.
  98. (1993). Team roles at work.
  99. (2002). Team self-assessment: Problem solving for small workgroups”
  100. (1995). Teams without roles: empowering teams for greater creativity” in The journal of management development.
  101. (1999). Testing Belbin‟s team role theory of effectively groups” in The journal of management development.
  102. (1985). The design studio.
  103. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.
  104. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River:
  105. (1995). The facilitator: as teams battle to be effective”
  106. (2006). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization (Revised and updated edition).
  107. (1973). The interpretation of cultures.
  108. (1994). The interpretation of document and material culture” in
  109. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford:
  110. (1969). The participant observer and „over-rapport‟”
  111. (2000). The PBL group: Self-reflections and feedback for improved learning and growth”
  112. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to scociological methods.
  113. (2009). The research audit trail – enhancing trustworthiness in qualitative inquiry” in Electronic journal of business research methods.
  114. (1959). The Sociological Imagination.
  115. (1998). The structure of Belbin‟s team roles”
  116. (1966). The tacit dimension.
  117. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield:
  118. (2009). Tussles, tensions, and resolutions”
  119. (1996). Tutors and small groups in problem-based learning”
  120. (1999). Using team roles” in
  121. (1988). Videotape recording in educational research” in
  122. (2002). What do we mean by educational research?” in
  123. (2000). When is a problem-based tutorial not a tutorial? Analyzing the tutor‟s role in the emergence of a learning issue”
  124. (2000). Whose group is it, anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL)”
  125. (2001). Why aren‟t they working” in
  126. (1996). Wisdom gained, wisdom given: instituting PBL in a Chinese culture”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.