Location of Repository

Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?

By Emma L. Angell, Carolyn Clare Tarrant and Mary Dixon-Woods

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the types of issues research ethics committees (RECs) raise in their letters about research involving the storage and use of human tissue. \ud Aims: To classify the issues that appear to trouble RECs and to identify how the implementation of the Human Tissue (HT) Act in September 2006 might have affected REC decisions. \ud Methods: 100 letters relating to applications about research use of human tissue were randomly selected from the National Research Ethics Service database, of which half were issued before the implementation of the HT Act and half post-implementation. Ethical issues raised by RECs were classified with a coding scheme developed using ethnographic content analysis. \ud Results: Many letters raised issues about informed consent, including specific concerns about the information to be provided to participants about the taking, using and storing of their tissue samples. However, RECs appeared to be less likely to raise concerns about informed consent to use or store tissue after the HT Act, and there was some evidence that RECs were more comfortable allowing archived tissue samples to be used without additional patient consent after the HT Act than before. \ud Conclusions: In the wake of the HT Act, RECs do not appear to be more cautious about approving research to use or store tissue without consent when responding to applications for ethical approval. The HT Act has provided clarity and authority to RECs and may indeed facilitate the process of gaining ethical approval for tissue-based research

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group for the Association of Clinical Pathologists
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1136/jcp.2008.060699
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9333
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001). Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. doi
  2. (2007). Consent for childhood cancer tissue banking in the UK: the effect of the Human Tissue Act doi
  3. (2001). Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey. doi
  4. (2004). Ethnographic content analysis. In doi
  5. (2004). Human Tissue Act doi
  6. (2006). Human Tissue Authority
  7. Informed consent is the issue that trouble RECs the most when they are reviewing applications to take, use or store human tissue for research.
  8. (2007). Is 'inconsistency' in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. doi
  9. (2002). Law and regulation of retained organs: the ethical issues. doi
  10. RECs appear to be more comfortable to allow tissue to be accessed without consent since the HT Act became law.
  11. RECs are concerned that patients should give explicit consent for the use of the tissue in future projects.
  12. (2004). The Human Tissue Act
  13. The Human Tissue Act has helped to clarify and make consistent certain issues that were previously left to the discretion of the reviewing REC.
  14. (2006). The Human Tissue Act: Reassurance for relatives, at a price.
  15. (2008). What do research ethics committees say about applications to do cancer trials? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.