Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children?

By Emma L. Angell, H. Biggs, F. Gahleitner and Mary Dixon-Woods


This is the author’s final draft of the paper published as Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2010, 95 (11), pp. 915-917. The final published version is available at DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.172395Objective: To identify issues raised by research ethics committees (RECs) in letters about applications to conduct research involving children. \ud Methods: Analysis of 80 provisional and unfavourable opinion decision letters written by RECs in response to applications to conduct research involving child participants. \ud Results: RECs were most likely to be concerned about issues relating to consent, recruitment, care and protection of participants, scientific design and confidentiality. RECs focused on children's status as “vulnerable”. They sought to ensure that children would be protected, that appropriate written language would be used to communicate with children and that an appropriate person would give consent for children to participate. \ud Implications: Researchers should be attentive to issues of potential vulnerability when preparing applications. REC letters may be improved by giving clear and explicit reasons for their opinions

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1136/adc.2009.172395
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). Ethnographic content analysis. doi
  2. (2007). Gillick competence, and consent for involvement in research. doi
  3. (2007). Is 'inconsistency' in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. Clin Ethics doi
  4. (2007). Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters. Soc Sci Med doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.