Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Corporate Condition

By Jeroen Veldman

Abstract

In this dissertation I aim to establish that the contemporary theory of incorporation rests on incoherent assumptions.\ud Using a historical approach, I distinguish three different historical discursive formations underlying the contemporary concept of incorporation. On the basis of a comparison of these three historical discursive formations I argue that the contemporary representation of incorporation is a result of the simultaneous use of these three formations, while the last discursive formation has become dominant.\ud This leads to a description of two problems of justification. The first problem is that in the contemporary theory of incorporation the three historical discursive formations, with their mutually exclusive assumptions, are all maintained in order to retain their practical effects. The second problem is that the assumptions underlying the third discursive formation are dominant, although this discursive formation employs a theory of representation that rejects the fundamental assumptions of the previous discursive formations. Together, these two problems lead to a contemporary theory of incorporation that relates to three historical discursive formations for their effects, but relates incoherently and inconsistently to the historical justifications for these effects.\ud I will argue that, as a result of this incoherence and inconsistency, the contemporary theory of incorporation introduces a singular reified representation, which leads to a reconceptualization of the basic concept of representation in the legal, economic, social and political systems of representations. Then, I will argue that this reconceptualization strongly favours incorporated reified singular legal representations over the legal, economic and political representation of natural persons. On this basis, I will conclude that the contemporary theory of incorporation leads to legal, economic, social and political theory that is based on fundamentally unequal types of representation with structural unequal attributions of agency, ownership and rights

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9309

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1936). (reprinted 2007), The general theory, doi
  2. 1897, The Legal Nature of Corporations,
  3. (1991). Agency Theory and the Criminal Liability of Organizations",
  4. (1998). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, doi
  5. (1993). Business organization and the myth of the market economy, doi
  6. (1990). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, doi
  7. (1992). Changing incorporation Bibliography Allen,
  8. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility, doi
  9. (1993). Communitarians, contractarians, and the crisis in corporate law",
  10. (1999). Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership", doi
  11. (1999). Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm: The Case Against Global Cross Reference", Colum.J.Transnat'l doi
  12. (2002). Consultation paper on corporate killing, Law Reform Commission,
  13. (1988). Contractual Theory of the Corporation, The",
  14. (2006). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: the failure of corporate criminal liability, doi
  15. (1994). Corporate Bodies and Guilty Minds", doi
  16. (1983). Corporate Governance and 'Economic Democracy': An Attack on Freedom", doi
  17. (2009). Corporate Governance, 4th edn, doi
  18. (1996). Corporate Governance, Stakeholding, and the Company: Towards a Less Degenerate Capitalism?", doi
  19. (1978). Corporate personality: a study in jurisprudence, Scientia Verlag, doi
  20. (1989). Corporate Persons", doi
  21. (2005). Corporations and criminal responsibility, 2nd edn, doi
  22. (1982). Corporations and morality, Prentice-Hall, doi
  23. (2009). Corporations are people too: a multi-dimensional approach to the corporate personhood puzzle",
  24. (1993). Corporations, crime, and accountability, doi
  25. (1999). Critical theory and postmodernism: Approaches to organizational studies" doi
  26. (1993). Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology, Discourse, Ideology...", The British journal of sociology, doi
  27. (2007). Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, doi
  28. (2009). Financialization and Corporate Governance", doi
  29. (1931). For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees", doi
  30. (1931). For Whom Corporate Managers are Trustees: A Note", doi
  31. (2008). Gower and Davies' doi
  32. (1911). Has the Common Law Received the Fiction Theory of Corporations",
  33. History of the Law of Business Corporations before 1800.", doi
  34. (2002). History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism", doi
  35. (1997). Images of organization, 2nd edn,
  36. (2003). Imagining the state,
  37. (1996). Individualism and Economic Order, doi
  38. (2000). Introduction: The Political Economy of the Company"
  39. (2000). Is the State a Corporation?",
  40. (1996). Kicking Corporate Bodies and Damning Their Souls", doi
  41. (1969). L'archéologie du savoir, doi
  42. (2009). Labor Rights as human Rights vs Multinational Corporations: Responsibility and Accountability, Kennispunt Faculteit Recht, Economie, Bestuur en Organisatie,
  43. (2006). Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history, doi
  44. (2010). Limited liability, shareholder rights and the problem of corporate irresponsibility", doi
  45. (1995). Memoirs of extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds, Office of the National illustrated library. doi
  46. (2000). Models for Imposing Corporate Criminal Liability: From Adaptation and Imitation Toward Aggregation and the Search for Self-Identity", doi
  47. (2006). Multinational Corporations, the Protest Movement, and the Future of Global Governance" doi
  48. (1989). Nexus of Contracts Corporation: A Critical Appraisal",
  49. (1981). No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick": An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment", doi
  50. (1999). Organization Theory as a Critical Science? Forms of analysis and 'new organizational forms'" doi
  51. (2005). Organization Theory as a Postmodern Science" doi
  52. (1945). Origins of the American Business Corporation",
  53. (1995). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twentyfirst century, doi
  54. (1971). Personality in Roman private law, doi
  55. (1989). Personalizing the impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights",
  56. (1985). Persons, rights, and corporations,
  57. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought, Basic Books, doi
  58. (2009). Pirates, merchants and anarchists: Representations of international business", doi
  59. (2005). Pluralism and the Personality of the State, doi
  60. (2005). Political Power & Corporate Control, the new global politics of corporate governance, doi
  61. (1968). Political Theories of the Middle Age: Translated with an introduction by Frederic William Maitland, doi
  62. (2003). Property and contract in contemporary corporate theory", doi
  63. (2007). Putting the Corporation in its Place", doi
  64. (1998). Rational choice theory and organizational theory: a critique, doi
  65. (1983). Reflections on the corporation as a social invention", doi
  66. (2005). Report on corporate killing, Law Reform Commission,
  67. (2000). Rethinking organisational behaviour,
  68. (1986). Rights, persons, and organizations, doi
  69. (1970). Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company,
  70. (1985). Santa Clara revisited: the development of corporate theory",
  71. (2005). Shareholder Primacy and the Distribution of Wealth", doi
  72. (1999). Socializing capital: The rise of the large industrial corporation in America, doi
  73. (2005). Specific Investment: Explaining Anomalies in Corporate Law",
  74. (2003). State, trust and corporation, doi
  75. (1990). Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise, The doi
  76. (1954). The 20th century capitalist revolution, doi
  77. (1988). The allocation of responsibility for corporate crime: Individualism, collectivism and accountability", doi
  78. (2004). The anatomy of corporate law: a comparative and functional approach, doi
  79. (2008). The Archaeology of Knowledge",
  80. (2009). The ascent of money, doi
  81. (2006). The Black Box of Bhopal: A Closer Look at the World's Deadliest Industrial Disaster,
  82. (1966). The Body Politic of the Corporation" doi
  83. (2005). The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea, doi
  84. (1962). The conduct of the corporation, Random House doi
  85. (2005). The corporation : the pathological pursuit of profit and power, doi
  86. (1993). The Corporation as Anomaly, doi
  87. (2006). The corporation, Greenwood Pub Group,
  88. (1982). The Criminal Liability of Corporations and Other Groups: A Comparative View", doi
  89. (1994). The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form", doi
  90. (2006). The governance of corporate groups, doi
  91. (1976). The Grapes of Wrath, doi
  92. (1926). The Historic Background of Corporate Legal Personality", The Yale law journal, doi
  93. (1997). The King's two bodies : a study in mediaeval political theology, doi
  94. (2004). The logic of scientific discovery", doi
  95. (1996). The modern corporation and American political thought: law, power, and ideology, Pennsylvania State Univ Press, doi
  96. (2007). The modern corporation and private property, doi
  97. (1994). The Nature of Man", doi
  98. The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History", doi
  99. (2006). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences, doi
  100. (1998). The quest for responsibility : accountability and citizenship in complex organisations, doi
  101. (2006). The Social Impact of Multinational Corporations: An Outline of the Issues with a Focus on Workers" doi
  102. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure", doi
  103. (1982). Toward a Theology of the Corporation, American Enterprise Institute,
  104. (2005). Toward an anthropology of public policy",
  105. (1976). Values and the Choice of the Model of the Individual in the Social Sciences",
  106. (1991). Where the law ends, doi
  107. (2003). Who are law's persons? from cheshire cats to responsible subjects", doi
  108. (1994). William Shakespeare: the complete works, doi
  109. (2005). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Zweitausendeins,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.