Location of Repository

Corruption, Fertility, and Human Capital

By Panagiotis Arsenis and Dimitrios Varvarigos


We build an overlapping generations model in which reproductive households face a child quantity/child quality trade-off and bureaucrats are delegated with the task of delivering public services that support the accumulation of human capital. By integrating the theoretical analyses of endogenous growth, corruption and fertility choices, we offer a novel mechanism on the driving forces behind demographic transition. In particular, we attribute it to the endogenous change in the incidence of bureaucratic corruption that occurs at different stages of an economy‟s transition towards higher economic development

Topics: Corruption, Demographic transition, Human capital, Economic growth
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9277

Suggested articles



  1. (2003). A stochastic model of mortality, fertility, and human capital investment”, doi
  2. (1999). Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous economic growth”, doi
  3. (2005). Cheap children and the persistence of poverty”, doi
  4. (2002). Child labour, fertility and economic growth”, doi
  5. (2009). Chronic disease burden and the interaction of education, fertility, and growth”, doi
  6. (1995). Corruption and growth”, doi
  7. (2008). Corruption, development, and demography”, doi
  8. (2002). Corruption, economic growth, and income inequality in Africa”, doi
  9. (2005). Corruption, inequality, and fairness”, doi
  10. (2009). Corruption, institutions and economic development”, doi
  11. (2011). Democracy, rule of law, corruption incentives, and growth”, doi
  12. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption”, doi
  13. (2010). Education versus fertility: evidence from before the demographic transition”, doi
  14. (2009). Education, corruption and the distribution of income”, doi
  15. (2000). Endogenous corruption in a neoclassical growth model”, doi
  16. (2003). Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters?”, doi
  17. (2005). Mortality reductions, educational attainment, and fertility choice”, doi
  18. (2010). Natural resources, democracy, and corruption”, doi
  19. (2005). Public expenditures, bureaucratic corruption and economic development”, Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research discussion paper no. 53, doi
  20. (1980). Testing the quantity-quality model: the use of twins as a natural experiment”, doi
  21. (2006). The incidence and persistence of corruption in economic development”, doi
  22. (2005). The more the merrier? The effect of family composition on children‟s education”, doi
  23. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality”, doi
  24. (2009). The transition of corruption: from poverty to honesty”, doi
  25. (1997). Why don‟t poor countries catch up? A cross national test of an institutional explanation”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.