Location of Repository

Year Five Turkish Teachers’ Interpretations and Implementations of the Turkish Guide Book in a State Primary School and a Private Primary School in Turkey

By Alca Dokuzoğlu

Abstract

This study focuses on the State and the Private Primary School teachers’ interpretations and implementations of the Turkish Guide Book. Turkey’s candidacy for accession to the European Union led to some reformations in education in 2004 (Aksit, 2006). One of the aims of the 2004 reforms was to introduce new teaching styles along with renewed textbooks and teachers’ guide books. However, throughout these reformation movements, there has been little attention given to teachers’ training. Although the Turkish Guide Book meant to standardise teaching nationwide, it was also meant to transform primary schooling in Turkey. The main purpose of this study is to gain an understanding of State and Private Primary School teachers’ interpretations and implementations of the Turkish Guide Book in Year Five of Primary Education in Turkey. In this research, naturalistic research tools were used to gather qualitative data. Observations, interviews and documentary analysis were the main research tools. The study took place in a State Primary School and a Private Primary School, both situated in Ankara, Turkey. The research was first conducted in the State Primary School from March 2007 to April 2007 which led to the idea of conducting further research in the private context. Research conducted in the Private Primary School took place between December 2007 and January 2008. The data were collected from ten primary school teachers by means of semi structured interviews and classroom observations. Drawing upon the theoretical framework of Foucault’s (1977) modern power control strategies, a major factor influencing teachers’ classroom practices both in the State and the Private Primary Schools emerged. A highly centralised Turkish educational system has a major influence on teachers’ classroom practices. However the State Primary School participants’ attitude towards teaching and learning was different from the Private Primary School participants. The State School participants had doubts about the new Turkish Guide Book; however they did not make any changes with their implementations of it. However, teachers from the Private School adopted various activities into their teaching. The difference among teachers’ classroom behaviour may be explained through the structure of the schools. Although both of the schools are controlled and inspected by Ministry of National Education (MONE), MONE’s influence over the State Primary School is more evident. Spatiality can also be considered to be a mode of modern power control (Massey, 1994). Therefore the structure of space in both the State and the Private Primary Schools is a form of surveillance apparatus. In particular, Ataturk portraits and Turkish flags were prominently displayed in every corner of the State School, which acted as a reminder of the state control and ‘Turkishness’. On the other hand, in the Private Primary School state control was not as apparent; however, the structure of the school was organised according to permanent visibility

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9174

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). 32450): A Qualitative Assessment of the Quality of Turkish Elementary Schools.
  2. (2006). 32450): Turkey-Education Sector Study: Sustainable Pathways to an Effective, Equitable, and Efficient Education System For Preschool through Secondary School Education
  3. (2007). A Polititcs of Passion in Education: The Foucauldian Legacy Educational Philosophy and Theory, 135-149. Appendix 2: Observation Field Notes Mrs Reason: doi
  4. (2005). A Qualitative Assessment of the Quality of Turkish Elementary Schools.
  5. (2002). A Skin, Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science In
  6. (1986). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development.
  7. (2004). Are We Allowed to...? Teacher Autonomy, doi
  8. (1990). Assessing In-Service Teachers'
  9. (1997). Balancing Individual and the Group: A Dilemma for the Constructivist Teacher. doi
  10. (1949). Basic Principals of Curriculum and Instruction Chicago and London The University of
  11. (1988). Case Study Research: A Qualitative Approach.
  12. (2007). Caught Napping: Images of Surveillance, doi
  13. (2009). Change in Beliefs After First Year of Teaching: doi
  14. (1994). Changing English Primary Schools? The Impact of the Education Reform Act at Key Stage One.
  15. (2009). Citizenship Education as an Instrument For Strengthening the State's Supremacy: An Apparent Paradox? doi
  16. (2007). Citizenship in a Global World: European questions and Turkish experiences London: Routledge The Battle for Turkey's Soul. doi
  17. (2008). Considering 'Best Practice': The Social Construction of Teacher Activity and Pupil Learning as Performance Cambridge doi
  18. (2005). Constructivism Does Not Only Happen in the Individual: Sociocultural Theory and Early Childhood Education Early Child Development and Care doi
  19. (1991). Course, Curricular, and Classroom Influences on the Development of Student Teachers' doi
  20. (1999). Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: the process of 'getting better at teaching' doi
  21. (2009). Demilitarisation of Education Has Begun, But Still Has a Long Way to Go. Today's Zaman Karakaya, S.
  22. (2007). Designing Qualitative Research London Sage Publications. doi
  23. (2007). Developing Effective Teacher Beliefs About Learners: The Role of Sensitizing Teachers to Individual Learning Differnces Educational Phychology doi
  24. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of The Prison London doi
  25. (2001). Disciplining Bodies: On the Continuity of Power relations in Pedagogy In
  26. (2004). Does It Matter What I Think?- An Exploration of Teachers'
  27. (2006). Educating Little Soldier and Little Ayses: Militarised and Gendered Citizenship in Turkish Textbooks In
  28. (1966). Education and the Quest for Modernity in Turkey London: George Allen & Unwin doi
  29. (2001). Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms (5 ed.). New Jersey Merrill Prentice Hall Egitim-Sen.
  30. (2008). Enlargement Retrieved 08.01, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm Fisher,
  31. (2007). Essential Teaching Skills (3 ed.). London Nelson Thornes Ltd Kyriacou,
  32. (2002). Essential Works of Foucault doi
  33. (2006). Exploring Social Constructivism : Theories and Practicalities. doi
  34. (2007). from http:www.sincan.gov.tr
  35. (2009). Gaining Insights into Teachers' doi
  36. Gender and Curriculum In doi
  37. (2000). Generalizability and the Single-Case Study In doi
  38. (2009). Grounded Theory Institution Retrieved 03/01/2011, 2011, from http://www.groundedtheory.com/what-is-gt.aspx
  39. (2006). Gubrium (Eds.), Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns London Sage Publications Charmaz, doi
  40. (2003). Ilkogretim Kurumlari Yonetmeligi (Turkish National Ministry Policy of Primary Schooling).
  41. (2004). Individual Action Planning: A Case of Self-Surveillance? doi
  42. (2003). Instructional Planning in a Centralized School System: Lessons of a Study Among Primary School Teachers in Turkey.
  43. (2010). Internal Inspection Unit (Ic Denetim Birimi). from http://icden.meb.gov.tr/index.html
  44. (2002). Introducing Students to the Generic Terminology of doi
  45. (2007). Is Constructivism Risky? Social Anxiety, Classroom Participation, Competative Game play and Constructivist preferences in Teacher Development. doi
  46. (1964). John Dewey's Impressions of Soviet Russia and Revelutionary world Mexico- China- doi
  47. (2000). John Dewey's Report of doi
  48. (2003). John Stuart Mill: On Liberty and Other Writings. Cambridge: doi
  49. (2003). Knowledge as Socially Constructed. In
  50. (1993). Lesson Planning and Classroom Management.
  51. (2006). Lesson Planning and the Student teacher: Rethinking the Dominant Model. doi
  52. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-four London: doi
  53. (2009). Ortaogretime Gecis Sistemi (The System of Transference Into Middle Education). Retrieved 21/05/2009,
  54. (2006). Philosophical Basis of Turkish and American Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs and Practices. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of
  55. (2004). Philosophy: 100 Essential Thinkers London Arcturus Publishing Limited
  56. (2004). Power Relations and Staffroom Spaces Forum doi
  57. (2006). Power, Knowledge and Embodiment doi
  58. (2007). Program Development Models and Reform in Turkish Primary School Mathematics Curriculum Journal. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/default.htm Baban,
  59. (2003). Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis In doi
  60. (1977). Reproduction; doi
  61. (1999). Researching Education: Perspectives and Techniques. doi
  62. (2001). Schooling and The Ownership of Knowledge In doi
  63. (2000). Situated Ethics in Educational Reserach London: RoutledgeFalmer
  64. (2008). Social Studies Teachers' Views of Learner-Centered Instruction doi
  65. (1998). Social Studies, Trivial Constructivism, and the Policies of Social KNowledge In doi
  66. (2007). Support The Basic Education Retrieved
  67. (2004). Teacher Autonomy: Power or Control? doi
  68. (2004). Teachers' doi
  69. (1984). Teachers' Classroom Decission Making London: Holt, Rinehart and
  70. (2009). Teaching Today Cheltenham Nelson Thornes Ltd Piaget,
  71. (1999). The Analysis of Documentary Evidence.
  72. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. doi
  73. (2001). The Classroom Environment: A Framework For Learning In
  74. (2003). The Culture of Education In Social Construction: A Reader London Sage Publications Bryman, A.
  75. (1979). The Education of The Future: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Socialist Education London: Pluto Press Limited Cayir, doi
  76. (2006). The Effect of a New Approach to Group Work on Pupil-Pupil and Teacher-Pupil Interactions. doi
  77. (2000). The National Grid For Learning: Panacea or doi
  78. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy Oxford: doi
  79. (2005). The Process of Getting Identity in Turkish Society: doi
  80. (2006). The Role of Cognitive and Socio-cognitive Conflict in Learning to Reason Mind and Society doi
  81. (2008). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Publication., from The Stanford University http://Plato.stanford.edu/
  82. (2008). The State of Citizenship Education in Turkey: Past and Present
  83. (2003). The Student's Guide to Research Ethics.
  84. (1994). The Teacher as a Person In
  85. The Turkish Education System and Developments in Education: Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education. doi
  86. (2004). The White Path (Publication.: http://www.thewhitepath.com
  87. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool For Qualitative Research Qualitative doi
  88. (2003). Things that make kids smart: A Vygotskian Perspective on Concrete Tool Use in Primary Literacy Claarooms. doi
  89. (1999). Thought doi
  90. (2005). Turkey: Challanges of Continuity and Change London Routledge Arayici, doi
  91. (2007). Turkish Teaching as a Special Teaching Field and its Problems.
  92. (2001). Vygotsky and Pedagogy London Routledge Falmer Demir,
  93. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind Cambridge: doi
  94. (1994). Wally's Story In doi
  95. (2007). What do Effective Teachers of Literacy Do? Subject Knowledge and Pedagogical Choices For Literacy. doi
  96. (1999). What Does the Teacher Do? Constructivist Pedagogies and Prospective Teachers' Beliefs About the Role of a Tecaher. Teaching and
  97. (2000). What is the Relationship between Social Constructivism and Piagetian Constructivism? An Analysis of the Characteristics of the Ideas within Both Theories. doi
  98. (2000). What Pupils Say: Changing Policy and Practice in Primary Education. London and Newyork:
  99. (2004). What Teachers Know.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.