Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Curriculum, intellectual property rights and open educational resources in British universities—and beyond

By David Hawkridge, Alejandro Armellini, Samuel Nikoi, Tania Rowlett and Gabi Witthaus

Abstract

Is the curriculum in British universities being influenced by decisions about ownership of intellectual property rights (IPR) in ‘open educational resources’ (OERs) that are available online under Creative Commons licenses, free of charge?\ud This paper provides the context for, describes and analyses three significant examples in British higher education where OERs are being created for use by academics and learners on campus or at a distance. OpenLearn and iTunes U, two of the British examples, are drawn from the Open University of the United Kingdom, which teaches over 200,000 undergraduate and graduate students almost entirely at a distance. The third example, OTTER, is at the University of Leicester, a campus university in England with about 7,000 distance learners. Both universities depend on government funding, student fees, research and entrepreneurial income. All three examples are funded indirectly by the British government, though OpenLearn has received substantial US foundation support as well. In presenting these examples, the questions arise of whether the projects are supply- or demand-driven, and of whether they are altruistic or not. Debate over intellectual property rights has influenced creation of the OERs and vice versa, but from these three examples it seems doubtful whether, as yet, OERs and IPR have significantly influenced British universities’ curriculum. The paper ends with discussion of how OERs created in British universities are influencing teaching and learning in other countries, as globalisation advances

Topics: British universities, Curriculum, Intellectual property rights, Open educational resources, Open University, University of Leicester, Beyond Distance Research Alliance
Publisher: Springer Science+Business Media
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s12528-010-9036-1
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/9073
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). Build it and they will come? Inhibiting factors for re-use of open content in developing countries’,
  2. (2009). Business, Innovation and Skills doi
  3. (2009). Case studies mapping the flows of content, value and rights across the public sector.
  4. (2000). Dollars, Distance, and Online Education: The new economics of college teaching and learning.
  5. (2006). From Pillar to Post: exploring the issues involved in repurposing distance learning materials for use as Open Educational Resources.
  6. (2008). http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/funding/project_management/open_content_l icences_jiscguidancenov2008.doc.
  7. (2010). OECD
  8. (2009). OERs: the promise and the pitfalls. Connections: Learning for Development,
  9. OpenLearn: Research report 2006-2008. The Open University,
  10. (2009). Permission granted: open licensing for educational resources’ Open Learning: doi
  11. (2008). What status for “open”? An examination of the licensing policies of open educational organizations and projects, Report from CC Learn to The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.