Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Influences on Professional Practice: The HRD practitioner and their choice of learning style questionnaire

By Richard James Waters


In an influential report, Coffield et al (2004) argued that the field of learning styles was dogged by increasing ‘theoretical incoherence and conceptual confusion’. Sadler-Smith (1996, 2001), Curry (1999) and Rayner (2007) echoed these criticisms and Curry (1999) commented that the learning styles literature was plagued with a plethora of published papers, many of which contained methodological and experimental design flaws. With these criticisms in mind, the question as to how HRD practitioners identified and selected a learning style questionnaire (lsq) to use in their professional practice was considered relevant. This study used a triangulated research strategy to identify and explain factors that influenced these choices and had Bhaskars’ Bases of Action model (1998) as an organising framework. The research demonstrated that from a wide range of lsqs available, that nearly 80% of HRD practitioners preferred to use one of only three of the most popular lsqs available. None of these fully met the quality criteria in Coffield et al (2004), namely demonstrating acceptable internal consistency, testretest reliability, construct validity and predictive validity. Factors driving practitioner choice were identified through the research as including: lsq brand strength, experience based habits gained through using an lsq, economic and cognitive ‘lock-in’ associated with an lsq, practitioner’s view of their own state of professional ‘mastery’ and their beliefs about how results are best delivered. Further insights included that the Myers Briggs Type Indicator was the most popular lsq and that there was only a limited knowledge of learning theories held by many practitioners. This research adds further to the debate about applied practitioners and their engagement with theory, research and evidence based practices. It offers a more dynamic model about practitioner decision making about, and engagement with, theory and research in support of their professional practice, than currently exists

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). (Ed.) Motivational Styles in Everyday Life: A Guide to Reversal Theory Washington: American Psychological Association Mabey, C doi
  2. (2002). 77- 101 accessed on 25/02/08 at Briner, R (2007) Is HRM evidence based and does it matter? IES Opinion accessed on 7/9/2009 at:
  3. (2005). A
  4. (2007). A Speculative Perspective on the Transfer of Behavioural Science Findings to the Workplace: ‘The Times they are AChangin’. doi
  5. (2005). Ab Components’ Impact on Brand Preference. doi
  6. (1999). Accessed on 11/12/08 at: Seale, C
  7. (2007). An Alternative Approach to Conceptualizing Interviews. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18,2, pp 179 doi
  8. (2005). Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practice. Academy of Management Learning and Education, doi
  9. (2003). Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. doi
  10. (2003). Biases in decision making and implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. doi
  11. (2005). Conceptualizing On-the-Job Learning Styles. Human Resource Development Review 4,4, pp 373 -400 Bhaskar, R doi
  12. (2002). Critical Realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical discussion. doi
  13. (2009). Defining HRD Scholar-practitioners. doi
  14. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Presentation made to the American Educational Research Association.
  15. (1984). Enhancing Organisational Research Utilisation: The Role of Decision Makers’ Assumptions. doi
  16. (2001). Epistemology and Work Psychology: New Agendas. doi
  17. (1994). Ethics: A European Review, doi
  18. (1975). Evaluating Training Programs.
  19. (2002). Fight the Power: The Limits of Empiricism and the Costs of Positivistic Rigor. doi
  20. (1996). Final word: Response to reaction to Holton article. doi
  21. (1996). forestry and fishing 0% 0 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 5.1% 11 Transport,
  22. (1996). Human Resource Development: Perspectives, Strategies doi
  23. (2005). Kinesthetic Nonsense.
  24. (2007). Learning Styles and SEN: A teaching elixir, learning chimera or just fool’s gold? Do learning styles matter? Support for Learning, doi
  25. (2002). Marketing: A Critical Realist Perspective. doi
  26. (2004). Methodological Triangulation and Realist Research: An Indian Exemplar
  27. (2008). National Occupational Standards accessed on 10/12th 2008 at:
  28. (2006). Neglected Perspectives in Work and Organizational Psychology. doi
  29. (2002). On categorical variables and nonparametric statistical inference in the pursuit of causal explanations. doi
  30. (2005). Ontology in Organisation and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective. doi
  31. (2008). Pedagogue: Perspectives on Health Science Education, Volume 9, pp- 1-Dawes, J
  32. (2005). Philosophy, Theory and Method in Social Work: Challenging Empiricisms Claim on Evidence Based Practice. doi
  33. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Edition) Thousand Islands: Sage
  34. (2002). Qualitative Researching (2nd Edition).
  35. (1998). Realism and Social Science in doi
  36. (2005). Realizing the Full Potential of Rising Talent (Volume 1): A Quantitative Analysis of the Identification and Development of High-Potential Employees. Washington: Corporate Leadership Council Corporate Leadership Council
  37. (2004). Research: An doi
  38. (2001). Teacher Professional Identity: Competing Discourses, Competing Outcomes. doi
  39. (2003). The Marketing Advantages of Strong Brands.
  40. (2006). The Philosophy of Social Sciences: New Perspectives.
  41. (1981). The possibility of a structural phenomenology: The case for Reversal Theory. doi
  42. (2001). The Psychophysiology of Metamotivation. doi
  43. (2005). The Unconscious Consumer: Effects of Environment on Consumer Behaviour. doi
  44. (2002). Theoretical Assumptions Underlying the Performance Paradigm of Human Resource Development Human Resource Development International 5,5, pp 199 - 215 Holton, E, doi
  45. (2002). Towards evidence based HRD practice in doi
  46. (2005). You Spin Me Round: The Realist Turn in Organization and Management Studies. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.