Location of Repository

Separate opinions in the European court of human rights

By Robin C.A. White and Iris Boussiakou


The full-text of this article is not currently available on the LRA. The original published version is available on the publisher's webiste: http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/1.toc\ud DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngn033Separate opinions, both concurring and dissenting, have been a feature of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights since its earliest days, but detailed studies of their incidence and impact have until recently been sparse. This article, based on an AHRC-funded research study, offers a survey of the research literature and describes the outcome of its own consideration of such opinions. The use of separate opinions in the European Court of Human Rights is significant, but the incidence of sole dissents by national judges is very low. It would appear that the main determining factor in the writing of a separate opinion is judicial temperament. There is some evidence that the background of judges prior to their election to the Court has some influence on their approach to writing separate opinions. The Court, however, demonstrates high levels of collegiality and the use of separate opinions contributes to the transparency of its decision-making

Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1093/hrlr
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/8711
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/2381/871... (external link)
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hrlr... (external link)
  • http://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org... (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.