Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Voices from the European court of human rights

By Robin C.A. White and Iris Boussiakou

Abstract

The full-text of this article is not currently available on the LRA. The orginal published version is available at: http://www.nqhr.net/The future of the Strasbourg Court, a large and very busy court, has been the subject f much discussion. The capacity of the Court to handle the volume of admissible cases remains a significant challenge, and is made more difficult by the absence of ratification by all contracting parties of Protocol No. 14. Ten years after the establishment of the new permanent court, nine judges reflected on aspects of the work of the Court and the challenges it faces. The main purpose of this article is to put into the public domain some extracts from those interviews, which cover a wide range of issues. The voices from the Court are offered in the context of an argument that the contracting parties need to recognise the constitutional nature of the Strasbourg Court, and should be, but probably are not, willing to change the admissibility rules to make determination by the Strasbourg Court a matter of discretion rather than entitlement

Publisher: Intersentia
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/8710
Journal:
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/2381/871... (external link)
  • http://www.nqhr.net/ (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.