Location of Repository

Household Welfare in Mexico after the 1994 Financial Crisis

By Jorge Ignacio Villasenor Becerra


While the short-run impacts of a crisis on the welfare of individuals and their living standards is a well studied issue, we know rather little about the spatial and temporal dimensions of these impacts. The immediate welfare cost of a crisis can be high, but how quickly do individuals recover? Are the impacts greater for some than for others? If so, who are hit the hardest? And, do households recover as the economy does after a crisis? These are all important questions over which the current literature does not offer yet a definitive answer. The estimations made using the case of the 1994 Mexican financial crisis and the data contained in the Mexican National Income and Expenditures Surveys (ENIGH) made by the Mexican National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics (INEGI) show that the impact of such a crisis was a dramatic deterioration of the welfare of the Mexican households in the immediate years after the crisis. On average, income and expenditure per capita fell by 23% in the immediate years after the crisis in comparison with its pre-crisis levels. Furthermore, by 2006 income and expenditure per capita was still below pre-crisis levels by a 1.5%. The results on the distributional effects of the crisis reveal that households located in rural areas, that don’t own their house, headed by males with lower levels of education and with a high number of unemployed members were hit the hardest by the 1994 Mexican financial crisis. Furthermore, the fact that it took them nearly 10 years to recover suggest that the most vulnerable households do not recover with the rest of the economy

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/8611

Suggested articles



  1. 2009.Socioeconomic status measurement with discrete proxy variables: Is principal component analysis a reliable answer? Review of Income and doi
  2. 2009.The Construction of an Assets Index: Measuring Asset Accumulation in Ecuador. In doi
  3. (2008). A Credit Crunch and Household Welfare: The Case of the Korean Financial Crisis. doi
  4. (1995). A Marriage Trichotomy and its Applications. doi
  5. (2008). Alternatives to inflation targeting in Mexico. doi
  6. (2006). An Asset Index for the Syrian
  7. (1994). An Introduction to Applied Welfare Analysis. In: doi
  8. (2007). Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. doi
  9. (2008). Assessing Asset Indices. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4605. The World Bank. doi
  10. (2006). Calculation and use of an absolute poverty line. Report for the Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs and Family of the Slovak Republic. Oxford Policy Management.
  11. (1994). Choosing a Welfare Indicator.
  12. (2007). Comparability Problems of ENIGH and their effects on the measurement of poverty.
  13. (1991). Comparing Poverty Rates Internationally: Lessons from Recent Studies in Developed Countries. The World Bank Economic Review, doi
  14. (1974). Complementarity: An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory.
  15. Constructing Socio-economic Status Indices: How to use Principal Components Analysis. doi
  16. (2008). Counting Heads or Counting Televisions: Can Asset–based Measures of Welfare Assist Policy–makers in Russia? doi
  17. (2002). Crisis and Income Distribution: a Micro-Macro Model for Indonesia.
  18. (1995). Crisis, restructuring and urban poverty in Mexico. doi
  19. (1997). Determinantes de la Pobreza de los Hogares. doi
  20. (1977). Development, poverty and basic human needs: some issues.
  21. (1997). Effects of Liberalization Programs on Poverty and Inequality: Chile,
  22. (2007). Emigration, Remittances and Labor Force Participation in Mexico. doi
  23. (1998). Empirical Approaches to the Measurement of Welfare.
  24. (2003). Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. doi
  25. (1990). Family size and the Education of children in the context of Rapid Fertility Decline. doi
  26. (2002). Financial Crises, Poverty, and Income Distribution.
  27. (1993). Gaining Ground: Poverty in the Postwar United States. doi
  28. (2006). Globalization and Poverty. NBER Working Papers 12347.
  29. (1999). Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis. Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper 135. Washington DC:
  30. (1998). Hogares con jefas mujeres y bienestar familiar en México. In: Schmakler, B. Familias y Relaciones de Genero en Transformación: Cambios Transcendentales en América Latina y el Caribe.
  31. (1999). Household budgets, household consumption and the crisis in Indonesia: Evidence from longitudinal household survey data. Santa Monica:
  32. (2004). Household Income Dynamics in Two Transition Economies. doi
  33. (2004). Households, poverty and policy in times of crisis.
  34. How do households Cope with Aggregate Shocks? Evidence from the Mexican Peso Crisis. doi
  35. (2002). How Mexico’s financial crisis affected income distribution. World Bank Policy Research working paper 2406.The World Bank. doi
  36. (2001). How to compare apples and oranges: poverty measurement based on different definitions of consumption. doi
  37. (1994). How well do static indicators identify the chronically poor. doi
  38. (2005). Identifying and Measuring Chronic Poverty: Beyond Monetary Measures, paper presented at doi
  39. (1996). Income, Expenditure and the Living standards of UK Households. doi
  40. (1994). Introduction to Pooling. In: Thomas Janoski doi
  41. (2007). Is poverty multidimensional? A comparison of income and asset based measures in five Southern African countries. doi
  42. (1996). Issues in Measuring and Modeling Poverty. doi
  43. (2005). Lasting local impacts of an economy wide crisis. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3503. The World Bank doi
  44. (2001). Life is not easy: Mexico´s quest for stability and growth. doi
  45. (2001). Measuring Health and Poverty: a review of approaches to identifying the poor. London: Department for International Development Health Systems Resource Centre (DFID HSRC).
  46. (2003). Measuring health inequality among children in developing countries: does the choice of the indicator of economic status matter?
  47. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. doi
  48. (2000). Measuring Living standards with Proxy Variables. doi
  49. (2000). Measuring Vulnerability: Who Suffered in the 1995 Mexican Crisis? IBRD mimeo.
  50. (2000). Mexico: Five years after the crisis.
  51. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: doi
  52. (1971). Monetary Policy and Consumption.
  53. (2007). Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI).
  54. (2007). Nacional de la Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL).
  55. (1977). On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis. doi
  56. (1995). Outcomes and Endogenous Explanatory Variables: Tests and Solutions with an Application to the Demand for Contraceptive Use in Tunisia. doi
  57. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2148. The World Bank.
  58. (1989). Pooled Time Series Analysis. doi
  59. (1995). Poverty and household size. doi
  60. (1989). Poverty and Social Security. UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf Ed.
  61. (2000). Poverty Comparisons over Time and Across Countries in Africa. doi
  62. (1992). Poverty comparisons: a guide to concepts and measures. Living Standards Measurement Working Paper 88.
  63. (2004). Poverty in Mexico: an assessment of conditions, trends, and government strategy.
  64. (2005). Poverty in rural and semi-urban Mexico during 1992-2002. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3576. doi
  65. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. doi
  66. (1985). Price Discrimination and Social Welfare. doi
  67. (1999). Protecting the poor from macroeconomic shocks: an agenda for action in crisis and beyond”. doi
  68. (2008). Pseudo panels and repeated cross-sections. In doi
  69. (1985). Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay. doi
  70. (2004). Sen’s capability approach to welfare economics. Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 0415. doi
  71. (1972). Significance Testing of the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. doi
  72. (1999). Social capital, household welfare, and poverty in Indonesia. doi
  73. (1999). The 1990s in Latin America: Another Decade of Persistent Inequality. doi
  74. (1997). The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. doi
  75. (1983). The Conceptual Basis of Measures of Household Welfare and Their Implied Survey Data Requirements. doi
  76. (1967). The Construction of Utility Functions from Expenditure Data. doi
  77. (2006). The Consumer Response to the Mexican Peso Crisis. doi
  78. (2002). The Distributional Impacts of Indonesia’s financial Crisis on household Welfare: a “Rapid Response” Methodology. The World Bank Economic doi
  79. (1978). The feminization of poverty: women, work and welfare.
  80. (1996). The Fertility Impact of Alternative Family Planning Distribution Channels in Indonesia. doi
  81. (2001). The Household Response to Mexican Peso Crisis. doi
  82. (2002). The impact of financial crisis on labor markets, household incomes and poverty: a review of evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, doi
  83. (2004). The Limits to Cumulative Causation: doi
  84. (2007). The Non-parametric Approach to Applied Welfare Analysis. doi
  85. (1957). The Permanent Income Hypothesis. NBER Chapters, In: A Theory of the Consumption Function,
  86. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. doi
  87. (1999). The real cost of Indonesia’s economic crisis: Preliminary findings from the Indonesia family life surveys.
  88. (2003). Transient and chronic poverty in turbulent times:
  89. (2005). Understanding Poverty Rates and Gaps: Concepts, Trends and Challenges. Foundations and Trends doi
  90. (2008). Unraveling the Economic Paradox of FemaleHeaded Households in Mexico: The Role of Family Networks. doi
  91. (2000). Welfare Impacts of Russia’s doi
  92. (2004). Welfare indicators: a review and new perspectives. 2 measurement of poverty.
  93. (1981). Welfarism: A Defense Against Sen's Attack. doi
  94. (2004). Who’s in charge of the central city? The conflict between efficiency and equity in the design of metropolitan area. doi
  95. (1997). Women-Headed Households: Poorest of the Poor? Perspectives from Mexico, Costa Rica and the Philippines. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.