Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Organization as process: drawing the line between endogenous and exogenous views

By Tor Hernes and Elke Weik


This paper offers a classification of process views in organization studies. We start by assuming that distinctions may be drawn between ways that stability of entities is conceptualized in organizational analysis. From this point of departure we explore four different process views, namely: process as flows, process as programmes, process as recursive reproduction and process as connectivity. The first two views—process as flows and process as programmes—tend to build on the assumption that processes take place within relatively stable contexts, such as the organization or the institutional environment. This we refer to as an “exogenous” view. A second type of views of process is what we refer to as “endogenous” views, which are based on the assumption that stabilization of entities resides in the process itself

Topics: Process, Endogenous, Exogenous, Stability, Organization
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.scaman.2007.06.002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. [1776](1986). The wealth of nations. doi
  2. [1909](1996) A Pluralistic Universe. doi
  3. (1999). A ‘Rhizomic’ model of organizational change and transformation: perspective from a metaphysics of change. doi
  4. (2004). After method – mess in social science research. doi
  5. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. doi
  6. (2003). and Tor Hernes (Eds.) doi
  7. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. doi
  8. (2005). Changing capitalisms? Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization. doi
  9. (1988). Decisions and organizations. doi
  10. (2005). En forklaring av stabilitetens dynamikk: Et rekursivt syn på dypstrukturer og strategisk endring.
  11. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations’ doi
  12. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change”. doi
  13. (1980). Hinings, Bob; Greenwood, doi
  14. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Brunsson, doi
  15. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. doi
  16. (1938). Modes of thought. doi
  17. (1997). Narrating the organization – dramas of institutional identity. doi
  18. (2006). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies.
  19. (2002). On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. doi
  20. (2003). Ontology: Organization as “world-making”. In doi
  21. (2000). Organisation und enscheidung. Opladen: doi
  22. (1999). Organization as process Latour,
  23. (2005). Organization as process Seidl,
  24. (1999). Organizational change and development. doi
  25. (1989). Organizational ecology. doi
  26. (2005). Organizational routines and the macroactor. In B. Czarniawska and T. Hernes (Eds.) Actor-Network theory and organizing.
  27. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. doi
  28. (2006). Organizing is both a verb and a noun: Weick meets Whitehead. doi
  29. (1994). Organizing modernity. doi
  30. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: doi
  31. Process and reality. doi
  32. (2004). Rethinking knowledge: A Bergsonian critique of the notion of tacit knowledge. doi
  33. (1987). Science in action. doi
  34. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, doi
  35. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: doi
  36. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. doi
  37. (1984). The constitution of society. doi
  38. (1983). The iron cage revisited; institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. doi
  39. (2005). The little engine that could: On the “managing” qualities of technology. In B. Czarniawska and T. Hernes (Eds.) Actor-Network theory and organizing (50-66). Stockholm: Liber and
  40. (1961). The management of innovation. doi
  41. (1987). The management of strategic change. doi
  42. (1990). The reforming organization. doi
  43. (2004). The spatial construction of organization. doi
  44. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity”. doi
  45. (2007). Understanding organization as process – theory for a tangled world. London: Routledge (forthcoming). doi
  46. (1969). Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution.
  47. (1997). What is a processual analysis? doi
  48. (1970). What is sociology?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.