Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Tavola rotonda città e paesaggio / City and Landscape Roundtable

By Alessandro Rocca, Matteo Agnoletto, Carlo Berizzi, Elisa Cristiana Cattaneo, Nicolò Privileggio and Nicola Russi

Abstract

Milano è capitale del Moderno ma anche del contemporaneo con edifici di tanti livelli diversi e con caratteristiche diverse che però mediamente, secondo me, sono di qualità buona. E questa architettura di qualità sostiene e legittima la trasformazione di una città, la aiuta e la guida nell’impresa, sempre traumatica, di cambiare la propria fisionomia, di spostare centralità, di rimescolare valori culturali e immobiliari.One of the aspects that I find absolutely decisive is the planning of public spaces, because it is necessary to mark the fundamental difference between the time when the first-generation large high-rise buildings were being built, when Pirelli and Velasca were building modernist totems (also in historicism of BBPR) but were substantially part of the late xix Century urban settings. Instead, in the new Milanese projects, the reinvention of public space is a critical transition, and these attempts, these as well for the most part of the highest quality, assert another idea of the city, an unexpected development of the xx Century Milan

Topics: City and Landscape, città e paesaggio
Publisher: Actar
Year: 2017
OAI identifier: oai:re.public.polimi.it:11311/1079570
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/11311/10... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.