Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Leadership and the strategic planning process in two government secondary schools in Singapore

By Chin Kern Joseph Tan


This thesis centres on the research problem of leadership and strategic planning processes in two Singapore government secondary schools, both of which were engaged in the strategic planning guided by the School Excellence Model (SEM) Framework launched in 2000. Many schools are apprehensive toward this mandatory requirement. They are unclear of the strategic planning approach, process, or model to adopt. This study investigates how the strategic planning process was established and managed in two contrasting case schools, and expounds on the factors influencing the strategic planning processes in each school. Emanating from the aims, the study seeks to address the following research questions: First, what do school leaders and teachers understand by strategic planning? Second, what are leaders’ and teachers’ perspectives on how schools develop their strategic plans? Third, what are leaders’ and teachers’ perspectives on how the strategic plan is implemented, managed and led? Fourth, what are the perceived helping and hindering factors engaging in strategic planning? In addressing the research questions, a case study approach and qualitative research methods using interviews, non-participative observations, and documentary analysis were employed to elicit in-depth information from school leaders and teachers of two contrasting schools, one deemed successful and the other less so, in implementing, leading and managing the strategic planning spectrum. Key findings, inter alia, suggest that the principal’s approach to leadership of the process of strategic planning greatly influenced the likelihood of successful implementation, influencing and shaping the approach of other senior staff and teachers. In particular, a more democratic and consultative approach inspired staff more to execute the plan compared to command and control –something of a paradox for Singaporean schools, given their centralised culture. Findings also affirmed that time allocated for strategic reviews at planning meetings, coupled with effective communication strategy to involve stakeholders, can enhance strategic thinking and capability of staff

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). A Case Study of School District Restructuring: Stakeholder Construction of Meaning (Doctoral Dissertation,
  2. (1996). A Deluge of Directives: Conflict Between collegiality and Managerialism in the Post-ERA Primary School, doi
  3. (2004). Academic Planning: The Heart and Soul of the Academic Strategic Plan,
  4. (2001). Asian Management Systems,
  5. (1993). Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform, doi
  6. (1965). Corporate Strategy: Business Policy for Growth and Expansion,
  7. (2007). Cultural Influences on Strategic Planning, doi
  8. (2001). Culture’s Consequences, Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organisations Across Nations, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications Hopkins,
  9. (1991). Educational Management: Strategy, Quality and Resources,
  10. (1996). Educational Planning: Strategic, Tactical, Operational,
  11. (2002). Effective Strategic Planning,
  12. (1991). ELMS Workbook: Planning Your School’s Strategy,
  13. (1994). Ethical Dilemmas Encountered in Researching Sensitive Issues. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Research in Education. -
  14. (2002). Ethics in Qualitative Research: Searching for Practice Guidelines. Paper presented at the
  15. (2000). Ethnography, doi
  16. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice, doi
  17. (1998). Factors Affecting the Perceived Effectiveness of Planning in Hong Kong Self-Managing Schools, Educational Management and Administration, doi
  18. (1993). Financial Management for School: The Thinking Manager’s Guide,
  19. (2000). Formulation, Implementation and Control of Competitive Strategy (7th Ed.),
  20. (1996). From Balanced Scorecard to Strategic Gauges: Is Measurement Worth It?
  21. (2005). Generalisation: Learning Across Epistemologies, Forum: Qualitative Social Research,
  22. (2000). Handbook of Human Resource Management,
  23. (1989). Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education, doi
  24. (1997). Masterplan for IT in Education, Ministry of Education, Singapore Mintzberg,
  25. (1992). Planning in School Administration – A Handbook,
  26. (1996). Preliminary Explorations of Indigenous Perspectives of Educational Management: The Evolving Malaysian Experience, doi
  27. (1999). Qualitative Research in Health: An Introduction, Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest NSW
  28. (1999). Reflecting on the Strategy Process, doi
  29. (1997). Resourcing Education: Linking Budgeting to educational Objectives, doi
  30. (2003). Rethinking Strategy and Strategic Leadership in Schools, doi
  31. (1996). SAGE Handbook for Research in Education: Engaging Ideas and Enriching Inquiry, doi
  32. (1990). School Effectiveness and School Improvement: A Mission Statement, doi
  33. (1993). School Leadership and School Development: Reflections from Research, doi
  34. (2007). Shaping Singapore’s Future: Thinking Schools, Learning Nation,
  35. (1990). Strategic Change: A New Dimension of Human Resource Management,
  36. (1989). Strategic Management in Public and Non-profit Organisations: Thinking and Acting Strategically on Public Concerns, (1st and re-print edition),
  37. (1989). Strategic Management: Where is the School Going? A Guide to Strategic Thinking, In
  38. (1996). Strategic Planning for School Improvement,
  39. (1992). Strategic Planning in America’s Schools: An Exploratory Study.
  40. (2000). Strategic Planning in Education: A Flawed Concept and A Way Forward, Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Conference, BEMAS Symposium, April,
  41. (2002). Strategic Safari: The Need for a More Viable Planning Process has Motivated Some Educators to Explore Future-based Planning as a Way to Initiate and Sustain Organisational Change
  42. (1962). Strategy and Structure, doi
  43. (1991). Strategy Implementation: Nature of the Problem,
  44. (1998). Strategy Safari, doi
  45. (1980). Structure is not Organisation,
  46. (1987). Substitutes for Strategy
  47. (1992). Teacher Appraised Cycle, Christchurch: User Friendly Resource Enterprise Ltd
  48. (2004). The Arts of Chinese Management: Theory, Evidence, and Applications,
  49. (1999). The Balanced Scorecard: A Potential Tool for Supporting Change and Continuous Improvement in Accounting Education, doi
  50. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review,
  51. (2005). The Decision-making Index: Gathering Quality Evidence for School Improvement,
  52. (1991). The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organisations, (3rd Ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass -
  53. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change, doi
  54. (1994). The Role of Fairness in Implementing Large-scale Change: Employee Evaluations of Process and Outcome in Seven Facility Relocations, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.