Location of Repository

A superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution during substorm growth, onset and recovery: open magnetic flux control of substorm intensity

By Steve E. Milan, Adrian Grocott, Colin Forsyth, S.M. Imber, Peter David Boakes and B. Hubert


This paper was published as Annales Geophysicae, 2009, 27 (2), pp. 659-668. It is available from http://www.ann-geophys.net/27/659/2009/angeo-27-659-2009.htmlWe perform two superposed epoch analyses of the auroral evolution during substorms using the FUV instrument on the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Explorer (IMAGE) spacecraft. The larger of the two studies includes nearly 2000 substorms. We subdivide the substorms by onset latitude, a measure of the open magnetic flux in the magnetosphere, and determine average auroral images before and after substorm onset, for both electron and proton aurora. Our results indicate that substorms are more intense in terms of auroral brightness when the open flux content of the magnetosphere is larger, and that magnetic flux closure is more significant. The increase in auroral brightness at onset is larger for electrons than protons. We also show that there is a dawn-dusk offset in the location of the electron and proton aurora that mirrors the relative locations of the region 1 and region 2 current systems. Superposed epoch analyses of the solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field, and geomagnetic indices for the substorms under study indicate that dayside reconnection is expected to occur at a faster rate prior to low latitude onsets, but also that the ring current is enhanced for these events

Publisher: Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.5194/angeo-27-659-2009
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7807

Suggested articles



  1. (1983). A.: Pitch-angle scattering of energetic protons in the magnetotail current sheet as the dominant source of their isotropic precipitation into the nightside ionosphere, doi
  2. (1967). Dynamics of auroral belt and geomagnetic disturbances, doi
  3. (1979). Energy coupling function and solar windmagnetosphere dynamo, doi
  4. (1992). Excitation and decay of solar wind-driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, doi
  5. (1970). Far ultraviolet imaging from the IMAGE spacecraft.
  6. (1961). Interplanetary magnetic fields and the auroral zones, doi
  7. (1992). Ionospheric convection and the substorm cycle, in: doi
  8. (1978). Large-scale characteristics of fieldaligned currents associated with substorms, doi
  9. (2007). Magnetic flux transport in the Dungey cycle: A survey of dayside and nightside reconnection rates, doi
  10. (1975). Mathematical representation of the auroral oval, doi
  11. (2009). Milan et al.: Superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution doi
  12. (2005). Observational evidence of the loading-unloading substorm scheme, doi
  13. (1985). Polar cap inflation and deflation, doi
  14. (2002). Proron aurora and substorm intensifications,
  15. (2008). Response of the expanding/contracting polar cap to weak and strong solar wind driving: implications for substorm onset, doi
  16. (1998). Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer, Space Sci. doi
  17. Statistical behavior of proton and electron auroras during substorms, doi
  18. (2007). Statistical description of the bulge-type auroral substorm in the far ultraviolet, doi
  19. (2004). Substorm onset observations by IMAGE-FUV, doi
  20. System design,
  21. (1998). The Advanced Composition Explorer, Space Sci. doi
  22. (1995). The Double Oval UV Auroral Distribution, 1. Implications for the Mapping of Auroral Arcs, doi
  23. (2003). Variations in the polar cap area during two substorm cycles, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.