Location of Repository

Evidence of critical reading expressed in Chinese students' group discussions of texts

By Cynthia Jean Macknish

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to gain insight into mainland Chinese students’metacognitive understandings and practice of critical reading (CR) in a pre-university second language (L2) reading course in Singapore. CR is interpreted as social practice that can involve a range of processes from analytical evaluations of texts to critiques of power relations and pursuit of social change. The assumption is made that CR engages students' critical stance which can be nurtured by teaching various tools that facilitate CR processes. As such, the impact of teacher intervention and other influencing factors were important considerations in this study. \ud Data collected from various sources revealed that the students’understandings of CR changed throughout the course to include a broader range of processes. This provided some insight which was enhanced when data from peer group discussions of texts showed what CR in this context looked like in practice. \ud The view is taken that interacting with texts and other people in a way that draws on various CR processes constitutes CR discourse (CRD). Transcripts were analysed to determine the nature and extent of CRD that students displayed in peer group discussions. Transcripts were also interrogated to explore factors that influenced those displays of CRD. Results indicate that, from the beginning of the course, these students displayed CRD, albeit often in small amounts and to variable degrees. This challenges notions of uncritical ‘Chinese learners’ (Atkinson, 1997; Wu, 2004). \ud Conditions for displaying more CRD were, however, never fully achieved. Various forms of scaffolding, text topic, and certain aspects of identity that emerged in interactions influenced displays of CRD, but inconsistencies indicate that these influencing factors interact in complex ways, at times enhancing, and other times restricting critical engagement. Awareness of these factors has implications for facilitating CR in L2 reading courses

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7768

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2008). (n.d.) 1989: Massacre in Tiananmen Square. Retrieved
  2. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people.
  3. (2004). 1). China‟s Cosmetic Surgery Market Flourishes. Cosmetic Surgery Times. Beijing. Retrieved http://cosmeticsurgerytimes.com/cosmeticsurgerytimes/article/articleDe tail.jsp?id=88306.
  4. (2004). 1). Slap, Punch, Stomp and Spit on Him, The Electric New Paper.
  5. (2001). 13) What is on the mind of the young in China? Lianhe Zaobao, Singapore. Retrieved www.zaobao.com.
  6. (2005). 24). Canada: Environmental Bad Boy, Guardian Unlimited. London. Retrieved from www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2005/oct/24/worlddispatch/climatech ange.
  7. (2004). 25). Ban on Head Scarves Makes Sense? Mais Oui. Daily News,
  8. (1998). 27). On the Brink. Asia Week,
  9. (2005). 4). How Panda Diplomacy Bamboozled the Leader of Taiwan. The Times, London. Retrieved from www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article388023.ece.
  10. (2004). 7). A who's who of players in the battle of biology class. The Christian Science Monitor.
  11. (2000). A beginner's guide to action research.
  12. (2006). A collaborative self-study into the development of critical literacy practices: A pilot study.
  13. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL.
  14. (2004). A handbook for teacher research: From design to implementation.
  15. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In
  16. (2001). A sociocultural perspective on early literacy development.
  17. (2001). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspective, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy.
  18. (2009). Action research: Three approaches.
  19. (2002). Action research: Towards the next generation. In
  20. (2001). Action research.
  21. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.
  22. (2006). Afterword: The Chinese learner in perspective.
  23. (2005). An Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (2nd ed.).
  24. (1999). An Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.
  25. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar.
  26. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research.
  27. (2005). Analysing learner language.
  28. (2003). Argument, evidence and engagement: Training students as critical investigators and interpreters of rhetoric and culture.
  29. (2000). Asian students‟ reticence revisited.
  30. (2006). Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning.
  31. (2000). Changing the role of schools. In
  32. (2001). Children reading critically: A local history. In
  33. (1997). Classrooms as Communities: Exploring the Educational Character of Student Persistence.
  34. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds?
  35. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking.
  36. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning.
  37. (1998). Comments on Dwight Atkinson's "A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL": A case for critical thinking in the English language classroom. A reader reacts.
  38. (2004). Cooperative learning as sociocultural practice.
  39. (2005). Course description: Academic reading comprehension course. Unpublished curriculum materials for the
  40. (2000). Creativity and collaboration in knowledge construction. In
  41. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  42. (1990). Critical Language Awareness Part 1: A critical review of three current approaches to critical language awareness.
  43. (1999). Critical language awareness: Key principles for a course in critical reading.
  44. (1992). Critical language awareness.
  45. (2001). Critical literacies and local action: Teacher knowledge and a “new” research agenda.
  46. (1997). Critical literacy and the question of normativity: An introduction. In
  47. (2007). Critical literacy educators at work. In
  48. (1997). Critical literacy in the classroom: The art of the impossible.
  49. (2004). Critical literacy: A questioning stance and the possibility for change. The Reading Teacher,
  50. (2002). Critical literacy: Beyond reason‟.
  51. (2007). Critical literacy: Context, research, and practice in the K-12 classroom. Thousand Oakes,
  52. (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge:
  53. (2000). Critical reading and writing: An introductory coursebook.
  54. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Houndmills,
  55. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  56. (1997). Critical thinking: Its definition and assessment.
  57. (1985). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge:
  58. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts.
  59. (2002). Developing academic reading at tertiary level: A longitudinal study tracing conceptual change.
  60. (2003). Developing critical literacy in a changing context: the challenges of „critique‟ in South Africa. In
  61. (2003). Developing critical reading skills (6th ed.).
  62. (2003). Dilemmas of cooperative learning and academic proficiency in two languages.
  63. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view.
  64. (2007). Discussion, collaborative knowledge work and epistemic fluency.
  65. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education.
  66. (2009). Educational Action Research.
  67. (2003). English language teaching in China: Regional differences and contributing factors.
  68. (1999). English Teaching, Critical Literacy, and the Possibility of Cultivating a Participatory Citizenry.
  69. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment.
  70. (2002). Environments, processes, and mechanisms in peer learning.
  71. (1989). Evaluating critical thinking.
  72. (1999). Exchanging ideas and changing positions: The importance of conversation to holistic, critical endeavors. In C. Edelsky (Ed.), Making justice our project: Teachers working toward critical whole-language practice (pp.55-76).
  73. (1938). Experience and education.
  74. (2005). Exploratory talk in peer groups - Exploring the zone of proximal development.
  75. (1987). Freire for the classroom: A sourcebook for liberatory teaching.
  76. (2001). From prescription to participation: Moving from functional to critical literacy in Singapore.
  77. (2007). from: http://www.tlri.org.nz/pdfs/9231_finalreport.pdf
  78. (2006). Groupwork in the EFL classroom in China: A closer look.
  79. (1991). How critical can you get? In
  80. (1971). How to read and study for success in college (3rd ed.).
  81. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process.
  82. (2000). I know I have to be critical, but how? In
  83. (1997). Identifying „Quality‟ in Classroom Talk: An Enduring Research Task.
  84. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change.
  85. (2003). Identity and text: Developing self-conscious readers.
  86. (2001). Importing critical literacy pedagogy: Does it have to fail?
  87. (1993). Informing critical literacy with ethnography.
  88. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.).
  89. (1989). Language and power.
  90. (2007). Language awareness and language learning.
  91. (2005). Language most frequently spoken at home.
  92. (1987). Learner contributions in task-based learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp 23-46). Englewood Cliffs,
  93. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge building. In
  94. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: Mythunderstandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners.
  95. (1993). Literacy and the politics of difference. In
  96. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge:
  97. (1996). Lively discussions!: Fostering engaged reading.
  98. (1993). Making sense: Teaching critical reading across the curriculum. New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
  99. (2002). Mapping online discussion in senior English.
  100. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
  101. (2003). MJ the technique the technology in Korea cosmetic surg109. LH surgery 110. MJ surgery is much more 111. J yeah 112. KM and maybe he want to compare the Asia Pacific Rim with Bibliography Allwright,
  102. (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students.
  103. (2001). Negotiating critical literacies in classrooms.
  104. (2007). Negotiating critical, postcritical literacy: The problematic of text analysis.
  105. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities.
  106. (2003). New literacies and changing knowledge in the classroom.
  107. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship.
  108. (2006). On the discursive construction of „the Chinese learner‟.
  109. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge:
  110. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. Bergman
  111. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China.
  112. (2003). PRC students and group work: Their actions and reactions. In
  113. (1951). Preface to critical reading (revised edition).
  114. (1993). Preface. In
  115. (2004). Problems faced by Chinese learners in L2 English learning and pedagogic recommendations from an inter-cultural communication perspective. Karen‟s Linguistics Issues. Retrieved
  116. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.).
  117. (1995). Reading with a suspicious eye‟: Critical reading in the foreign language classroom.
  118. (1997). Reading with an attitude; or, Deconstructing „Critical literacies‟ Response to Alan Luke and Peter Freebody. In
  119. (2006). Reconceptualizing literacy through a discourses perspective by analyzing literacy events represented in films about schools.
  120. (1998). Reconstructing Sally: Narratives and counter narratives around work, education and workplace restructure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education,
  121. (2006). Recontexualisation processes as sense-making practice in student-writers‟ collaborative dialogue.
  122. (1999). Redefining adolescent literacies,
  123. (2006). Researching critical literacy: A critical study of analysis of classroom discourse.
  124. (2006). Researching second language classrooms.
  125. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching.
  126. (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective.
  127. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom.
  128. (2002). Scaffolding reflection for preservice and inservice teachers. Reflective Practice,
  129. (2002). Scaffolding student talk: One teacher‟s role in literature discussion groups.
  130. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning.
  131. (2007). Scaffolding, multiliteracies, and reading circles.
  132. (2006). Second language classroom reading: A social constructivist approach. The Reading Matrix,
  133. (2000). Self-censorship: Singapore‟s shame. Singapore: Think Centre.
  134. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge:
  135. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom.
  136. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning.
  137. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development.
  138. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In
  139. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices.
  140. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development.
  141. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy.
  142. (2000). Teaching abroad: Lessons learned about intercultural understanding for teachers in higher education.
  143. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university.
  144. (1991). Teaching students from overseas: A brief guide for lecturers and supervisors.
  145. (2005). Teaching styles and methodologies: Communicative language teaching.
  146. (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives, Hong Kong & Melbourne: CERC and ACER
  147. (1995). Text, lies and videotape: Stories about life, literacy and learning.
  148. (2002). That‟s what you‟re here for, you‟re suppose to tell us‟: Teaching and learning critical literacy.
  149. (1966). The art of efficient reading.
  150. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental
  151. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In
  152. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective.
  153. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities.
  154. (2005). The master reader.
  155. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue.
  156. (2005). The reader‟s apprentice: Making critical cultural reading visible.
  157. (2003). The role of peer support in ESL students‟ accomplishment of oral academic tasks.
  158. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving.
  159. (2007). Traditional Chinese culture and ELT.
  160. (2004). Two takes on being critical. In
  161. (2004). Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to guide group work in an extensive reading class in China.
  162. (1985). Varieties of discourse in supervisory conferences.
  163. (2000). way: Using the everyday to create a critical literacy curriculum. Primary Voices,
  164. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge:
  165. (1998). When solo activity is not privileged: Participation and internalization models of development.
  166. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse?
  167. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy.
  168. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London and
  169. (1979). XM maybe(…) 105. LH yeah 106. WA it is although the Chinese government said that it is 182. SH [the cultural revolution 183. K [the cultural revolution 184. RJ the cultural revolution 185. SH at the beginning 186. K in the 70‟s 187. SH
  170. (1993). You want to do an action research thesis? Retrieved

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.