Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Helping offenders into employment: How far is voluntary sector expertise valued in a contracting-out environment?

By Julie Vennard and Carol Hedderman

Abstract

The Probation Service has, for some years, worked with external service providers in partnership. One strand of this work has involved collaboration with voluntary sector organizations in helping offenders into education training and employment (ETE). Underlying this work is a slim but important evidence base, which shows that offending diminishes when offenders gain employment, and that being in work may trigger longer term desistance. \ud \ud Drawing on an evaluation of a government-sponsored `Employment Pathfinder' and on other relevant research, the article argues that recent governmental pressure to contract out services, and to adhere to certain `what works in reducing re-offending' principles, has given rise to tension within this collaboration attributable to conflicting ideology and practice. Specifically, this has created a context in which there is limited scope to adopt practices which are informed by knowledge about `what works' in getting people into employment. A less prescriptive approach from the centre about what should be delivered, and how, would restore effective teamwork and might also open up probation practice to empirical and theoretical insights into the desistance process. Wider implications of these findings for the future involvement of organizations with expertise in the provision of services for offenders are discussed

Publisher: SAGE Publications, in association with the British Society of Criminology.
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1177/1748895809103495
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7693
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A Desistance Paradigm for Offender Management', doi
  2. (2008). Agency Framework Document.
  3. (1996). An Evaluation of Prison Work and Training. Occasional Paper. London: Home Office.
  4. (2001). Barriers to Employment for Offenders and Ex-Offenders.
  5. (2004). Basic Skills Programmes in the Probation Service: An Evaluation of the Basic Skills Pathfinder. Findings 203. London: Home Office. doi
  6. (1998). Building Bridges into Employment and Training for Ex-Offenders.
  7. (2001). Building Bridges to Employment for Prisoners. Research Study No. 226. London: Home Office.
  8. (2002). Community Justice, Time and the New National Probation Service', doi
  9. (2008). Community Penalties and Home Office Research: On the Way Back to "Nothing Works"?', doi
  10. (2002). Criminal Sanctions versus Psychologically-Based Interventions with Offenders: A Comparative Empirical Analysis', doi
  11. Dench,S.,F.HillageandP.Coare(2006) The Impact of Learning on Unemployed,LowQualified Adults: A Systematic Review. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
  12. (2006). Department for Education and Skills and Department for Work and Pensions
  13. (2004). Desistance from Crime: A Theoretical Reformulation', Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und doi
  14. (1999). Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation', doi
  15. (1998). Effective Interventions with Offenders',in P. Goldblatt and C. Lewis (eds) Reducing Reoffending: An Assessment
  16. (1989). Employment, Crime and Offenders. doi
  17. (2008). Evaluating Offending Behaviour Programmes: Does Only Randomization Glister?', doi
  18. (1997). Evaluation of a Home Office Initiative to Help Offenders into Employment. London: Home Office.
  19. (1998). Evidence-Based Practice Guide: A Guide to Effective Practice. London: Home Office HMIP.
  20. (2004). Ex-Offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice',
  21. (2004). Examining Case Management Models for Community Sentences. Home Office Online Report 17/04. London: Home Office.
  22. (1999). Explaining Reconviction Following a Community Sentence: The Role of Social Factors. Home Office Research Study No. 192. London: Home Office. doi
  23. (2006). From Custody to the Community: Effective Support and IAG Services', unpublished paper prepared for 2nd Annual Conference: Offenders, Learning, Skills and Employability,
  24. (2008). Giving Up and Giving Back: Desistance,Generativity and Social Work with Offenders',
  25. (1999). Going Straight to Work.
  26. (2000). Implementing What Works with Offenders: The Effective Practice Initiative', doi
  27. (2008). Improving Employment Interventions:
  28. (2003). Information, Advice and Guidance for Adults: The National Framework and Action Plan. London: Department for Employment and Skills.
  29. (2002). Introducing Pathfinder Programmes into the Probation Service: An Interim Report. Home Office Research Study 247. London: Home Office.
  30. (2008). It's Nothing Short of Vandalism',
  31. (2001). Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. doi
  32. (2005). Partnership Working with Young Offenders with Substance Abuse Problems', doi
  33. (2007). Partnerships in Probation', doi
  34. (2007). Past, Present and Future Sentences: What Do We Know about Their Effectiveness?', doi
  35. (2007). PS Plus: A Prison (Lately) Probation-Based Employment Resettlement Model',
  36. (2006). Rapid Evidence Assessment of Interventions that Promote Employment for Offenders. Research Brief RB 747.
  37. (2002). Reducing Offending by Ex-Prisoners. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
  38. (2004). Reducing Re-Offending National Action Plan. London: Home Office.
  39. (2004). Reparative and Restorative Approaches',
  40. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. doi
  41. (2007). Risk-Need-Responsivity Model for Offender Assessment and Rehabilitation. User Report No. 2007-06. Public Safety Canada.
  42. (2005). Skills in the UK: The Long-Term Challenge. London: HM Treasury.
  43. (2004). Social Capital and Offender Re-Integration: Making Probation Desistance Focused',
  44. (1999). Structuration, Human Development and Desistance from Crime', doi
  45. (2006). Style or Substance? A Review of the Evidence Base for the Use of Learning Styles in Probation', doi
  46. (2006). Supporting Offenders with Multiple Needs', doi
  47. (2004). Testing Times: How the Policy and Practice Environment Shaped the Creation of the "What Works" Evidence-Base',
  48. (2004). The Evaluation of the Employment Pathfinder: Lessons from Phase 1, and a Survey for Phase 11. Online Report 22/04. London: Home Office. doi
  49. (2005). The Impact of Corrections on Offending: A Review of 'What Works'. Home Office Research Study 291, 2nd edn. London: Home Office. doi
  50. (2004). The Importance of Staff Practice in Delivering Effective Correctional Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Review of Core Correctional Practice', doi
  51. (2006). The NOMS Offender Management Model. London: National Offender Management Service. doi
  52. (2004). The Reducing Burglary Initiative: Planning for Partnership. Development and Practice Report 4. London: Home Office.
  53. (2006). The Resettlement of Prisoners Promotes Desistance from Crime: Or Does It?', Criminology and Criminal Justice 6(1): doi
  54. (2003). The Resettlement of Short-Term Prisoners: An Evaluation of Seven Pathfinders. RDS Occasional Paper No 83. London: Home Office. doi
  55. (2007). The Voluntary Sector and Prisoners' Resettlement',
  56. (2003). Trying It Out—the Role of 'Pilots' in Policy-Making: Report of a Review of Government Pilots. London: Cabinet Office.
  57. (1982). Unemployment and Crime',
  58. (1986). Unemployment, School Leaving and Crime',
  59. (1990). Volunteers in the Criminal Justice System: A Comparative Study of Probation, Police, and Victim Support. Milton Keynes:
  60. (2005). What Works in Offender Management?', doi
  61. (2000). Working Their Way Out of Offending: An Evaluation of Two Probation Employment Schemes. Home Office Research Study No. 218. London: Home Office. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.