Location of Repository

Alice through the looking glass: Strategic monetary and fiscal policy interaction in a liquidity trap

By Sanjit Dhami and Ali al-Nowaihi

Abstract

The recent experience with low inflation has reopened interest in the liquidity\ud trap; which occurs when the nominal interest rate reaches its zero lower bound. To\ud reduce the real interest rate, and to stimulate the economy, the modern literature\ud highlights the role of high inflationary expectations. Using the Dixit-Lambertini\ud (2003) framework of strategic policy interaction, we find that the optimal institu-\ud tional response to the possibility of a liquidity trap has two main components. First,\ud an optimal inflation target given to the Central Bank. Second, the Treasury, who\ud retains control over fiscal policy and acts as leader, is given optimal output and\ud inflation targets. This keeps inflationary expectations su¢ ciently high and achieves\ud the optimal rational expectations pre-commitment solution. Simulations show that\ud this arrangement is (1) optimal even when the Treasury has no inflation target but\ud follow's the optimal output target and (2) 'near optimal' even when the Treasury\ud follows its own agenda through a suboptimal output target but is willing to follow an\ud optimal inflation target. Finally, if monetary policy is delegated to an independent\ud central bank with an optimal inflation target, but the Treasury retains discretion\ud over fiscal policy, then the outcome can be a very poor one

Topics: liquidity trap, strategic monetary-fiscal interaction, optimal Taylor rules
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7472

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1987). Rules and discretion with non-coordinated monetary and scal policiesEconomic Inquiry : doi
  2. (2005). The case for open market operations in a liquidity trapAmerican Economic Review, doi
  3. (2005). Fiscal remedies for Japans slump, doi
  4. (2002). Avoiding liquidity traps, doi
  5. (2002). Deation: Making sure that it does not happen herespeech on November 21, Federal Reserve Board.
  6. (2003). Monetary Policy and Unemploymentpresented at the conference Monetary policy and the labour market. A conference in honor of James Tobin.
  7. (2000). Monetary policy at the zero lower bound: Balancing the risks doi
  8. (2003). Overcoming the zero bound on nominal interest rates with negative interest on currency: doi
  9. (2003). Monetary policy when the nominal short term interest rate is zero,Topics in Macroeconomics, doi
  10. (2003). Interactions of commitment and discretion in monetary and scal policiesAmerican doi
  11. (2000). Fiscal discretion destroys monetary commitmentmimeo., doi
  12. (2006). The deationary bias and committing to being irresponsible doi
  13. (2006). Fiscal multipliers and policy coordinationFederal Reserve Bank of New York,
  14. (2003). The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policyBrookings Papers On Economic Activity, doi
  15. (1999). Ination dynamics: A structural econometric doi
  16. (2003). Comments on: The zero lower bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy Paper prepared for the Brookings Panel on Economic Activity, doi
  17. (2005). Monetary and scal policy in a liquidity trap: The Japanese experience 1999-2004, NBER Working Paper No. doi
  18. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money doi
  19. (1999). Thinking about the liquidity trap, doi
  20. (1998). Its baaack! Japans slump and the return of the liquidity trap doi
  21. (2001). The Great Recession: Lessons for Macroeconomic Policy from Japan," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, doi
  22. (2003). Monetary and scal policy coordination and macroeconomic stabilization: A theoretical analysis Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=380322 or DOI: doi
  23. (2001). The Inexorable And Mysterious Trade-o¤ doi
  24. (2000). Theoretical analysis regarding a zero lower bound on nominal interest doi
  25. (2003). Ination target as a bu¤er against liquidity trapInstitute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Discussion Paper No.
  26. (2002). E¢ cient monetary policy design near price stabilityJournal of the
  27. (1985). The optimal commitment to an intermediate monetary target doi
  28. (1999). Interest rate rules in an estimated sticky price model in Monetary Policy Rules. doi
  29. (2006). Can rational expectations sticky-price models explain ination dynamics?American doi
  30. (1998). Restoring Japans Economic Growth,
  31. (2003). Implications of rational inattention doi
  32. (2003). Escaping from a liquidity trap and deation: The foolproof way and others, doi
  33. (2005). Central bank communication and policy e¤ectiveness Presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium, The Greenspan Era: Lessons for the FutureJackson Hole,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.