Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Constructing Learning: Adversarial and Collaborative Working in the British Construction Industry

By Daniel Bishop, Alan Felstead, Alison Fuller, Nick Jewson, Konstantinos Kakavelakis and Lorna Unwin

Abstract

This working paper is Research Paper No. 13 of a series produced for Learning as Work: Teaching and Learning Processes in the Contemporary Work Organisation, an ESRC Teaching and Learning Programme (TLRP) Phase III funded project (2003 - 2008). It is available from http://learningaswork.cf.ac.uk/outputs.htmlThis paper examines two competing systems of organising the\ud construction process and their consequences for learning. Under the\ud adversarial system, contractors compete solely on price, risks are shifted\ud onto those next in line and disputes are institutionalised through\ud complicated, but inevitably incomplete, contracts. However, under\ud collaborative working the costs and risks of the project are shared and the\ud parties involved communicate openly and freely, often in the absence of\ud tightly specified contracts. The move from the former to the latter –\ud prompted and encouraged by government enquiries, large public sector\ud clients and building regulations – represents a shift towards a climate in\ud which problems are shared and solved regardless of where they occur in\ud the productive system (a process conceptualised as ‘knotworking’ in the\ud literature). The paper argues that such learning theories and policy\ud pressures from above fail to take adequately into account the heavy hand\ud of history and the importance of understanding the nature of the\ud productive systems in which ‘knotworking’ is expected to occur. Both are\ud important in understanding the fragility of collaborative working across\ud the stages and structures of the construction production process which\ud place limits on making ‘knotworking’ an habitual and commonplace\ud activity

Publisher: Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7351

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). A learning culture for strategic partnering in construction’, doi
  2. (2000). Activity Theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work’, doi
  3. (2004). Altogether Stronger: Skills Needs Analysis for Construction (executive summary), Bircham Newton: CITB-Construction Skills.
  4. (2005). An evaluation of partnership development in the construction industry’, doi
  5. (2004). Applying the survey method to learning at work: a recent UK experiment’,
  6. (1997). Co-ordination, co-operation and communication in the courts: expansive transitions in legal work’,
  7. (2002). Complex design problems: An impetus for learning and knotworking’
  8. (2006). Connecting culture and learning in organisations: a review of current themes’,
  9. Constructing Excellence (2003) Partnering in Practice, London: Constructing Excellence.
  10. Constructing Excellence (2004) Supply Chain Partnering, London: Constructing Excellence.
  11. (2008). Constructing learning: adversarial and collaborative working doi
  12. (1994). Constructing the Team: Final Report of the Government / Industry Review
  13. (2002). Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say?’,
  14. (2005). Construction Partnering and Integrated Teamworking, doi
  15. (2001). Construction supply chain partnerships: skills, knowledge and attitudinal requirements’, doi
  16. (2001). Contextualising a new approach to learning: some comments on Yrjo Engeström’s theory of expansive learning’, doi
  17. (2006). Continuity, change and conflict: the role of knowing in different productive systems’,
  18. (2000). Creative work systems in destructive markets’, doi
  19. (2001). Development of a conceptual model of construction partnering’, doi
  20. (2007). Engeström’s version of Activity Theory: a conservative praxis?’ doi
  21. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical conceptualization’, doi
  22. (2004). Expansive learning environments: integrating organizational and personal development’, in
  23. (2001). Generating opportunities for SMEs to develop partnerships and improve performance’ doi
  24. (2007). Grooving to the same tunes? Learning, training and productive systems in the aerobics studio’, doi
  25. (2004). High performance management: a literature review’,
  26. (2004). High Performance Management: a literature review’.
  27. (2007). I am a genuine person”: sales training and the limits of moulding instrumentality’ doi
  28. (2001). Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms’, doi
  29. (2008). Learning, knowing and controlling “the stock”: the changing nature of employee discretion in a supermarket chain’ Learning as Work Research Paper No 12, Cardiff: Cardiff School of Social Sciences, doi
  30. (2002). Managing construction supply chains: the common sense approach’, doi
  31. (2006). Moving to the music: learning processes, training and productive systems – the case of exercise to music instruction’,
  32. (2004). of Trade and Industry doi
  33. (1998). Organisational learning and inter-firm “partnering” in the UK construction industry’, doi
  34. (2007). Organisational learning in the “knots”: discursive capacities emerging in a school-university collaboration’ doi
  35. (2000). Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas’, doi
  36. (2006). Partnering in the Construction Industry: A Code of Practice for Strategic Collaborative Working,
  37. (2000). Partnering is the foundation of a learning organization’,
  38. (1997). Partnering on construction projects: a study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success’, doi
  39. (2005). Partnering practice in the relationship between clients and main contractors’
  40. (2007). Performing identities at work: evidence from contrasting sectors’,
  41. (2003). Pre-construction partnering: from adversarial to collaborative partnerships’, doi
  42. (2002). Problematic issues associated with project partnering: the contractor perspective’, doi
  43. (2002). Productive Systems and the Structuring Role of Economic and Social Theories,
  44. (2000). Quality relationships: partnering in the construction supply chain’, doi
  45. (2001). Subcontract procurement: are relationships changing?’, doi
  46. (1997). Subcontractor partnering: I’ll believe it when I see it’ doi
  47. (2005). Surveying the scene: learning metaphors, survey design and the workplace context’, doi
  48. (1998). Task Force
  49. (2006). The Views and Experiences of Specialist Contractors on Partnering, doi
  50. (2007). There’s a lot more to it than just cutting hair, you know: managerial controls, work practices and identity narratives among hair stylists’, Learning as Work Research Paper No 8, Cardiff: Cardiff School of Social Sciences,
  51. (2007). Transforming knowledge and skills: reconfiguring the productive system of a local authority’, Learning as Work Research Paper No 10, Cardiff: Cardiff School of Social Sciences,
  52. (2001). Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas doi
  53. (1999). When the center does not hold: the importance of knotworking’,
  54. (2004). Workplace learning: main themes and perspectives’,
  55. (2005). Worlds within worlds: the relationship between context and pedagogy

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.