Location of Repository

Public health professionals' perceptions toward provision of health protection in England: a survey of expectations of Primary Care Trusts and Health Protection Units in the delivery of health protection

By Paul A. Cosford, Mary O'Mahony, Emma L. Angell, Graham Bickler, Shirley Crawshaw, Janet Glencross, Stephen S. Horsley, Brian McCloskey, Richard Puleston, Nichola Seare and Martin D. Tobin

Abstract

Background:\ud Effective health protection requires systematised responses with clear accountabilities. In England, Primary Care Trusts and the Health Protection Agency both have statutory responsibilities for health protection. A Memorandum of Understanding identifies responsibilities of both parties, but there is a potential lack of clarity about responsibility for specific health protection functions. We aimed to investigate professionals' perceptions of responsibility for different health protection functions, to inform future guidance for, and organisation of, health protection in England.\ud \ud Methods:\ud We sent a postal questionnaire to all health protection professionals in England from the following groups: (a) Directors of Public Health in Primary Care Trusts; (b) Directors of Health Protection Units within the Health Protection Agency; (c) Directors of Public Health in Strategic Health Authorities and; (d) Regional Directors of the Health Protection Agency\ud \ud Results:\ud The response rate exceeded 70%. Variations in perceptions of who should be, and who is, delivering health protection functions were observed within, and between, the professional groups (a)-(d). Concordance in views of which organisation should, and which does deliver was high (≥90%) for 6 of 18 health protection functions, but much lower (≤80%) for 6 other functions, including managing the implications of a case of meningitis out of hours, of landfill environmental contamination, vaccination in response to mumps outbreaks, nursing home infection control, monitoring sexually transmitted infections and immunisation training for primary care staff. The proportion of respondents reporting that they felt confident most or all of the time in the safe delivery of a health protection function was strongly correlated with the concordance (r = 0.65, P = 0.0038).\ud \ud Conclusion:\ud Whilst we studied professionals' perceptions, rather than actual responses to incidents, our study suggests that there are important areas of health protection where consistent understanding of responsibility for delivery is lacking. There are opportunities to clarify the responsibility for health protection in England, perhaps learning from the approaches used for those health protection functions where we found consistent perceptions of accountability.Peer-reviewedPublisher Versio

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-297
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/7340
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2003). A fragmented patient safety concept: the structure and culture of safety management in healthcare. Hosp Top doi
  2. (1999). A: Australian disaster triage: a colour maze in the Tower of Babel. doi
  3. (2004). Accountability for health protection in England: how this has been affected by the establishment of the Health Protection Agency. Communicable Disease and Public Health
  4. (2006). Favourable impact of an infection control network on nosocomial infection rates in community hospitals. Infection Control Hosp Epidemiol doi
  5. (1986). Health and Social Security. In The report of the committee of inquiry into an outbreak of food poisoning at Stanley Royd Hospital London;
  6. (2003). Health Protection Agency. Minutes of the Board Meeting of the Health Protecion Agency held on 5
  7. (2002). Health; Getting ahead of the curve: A strategy for combating infectious diseases. London; Department of Health; doi
  8. (2002). Health; Health protection: A consultation document on creating a health protection agency. London; Department of Health; doi
  9. Health; Shifting the balance of power within the NHS: securing delivery. London; Department of Health;
  10. (2003). Joint Chairs of SARS Expert Committee: SARS in Hong Kong: from experience to action. SARS Expert Committee; Hong Kong; doi
  11. (1986). Lessons from the outbreak of food poisoning at Stanley Royd Hospital: what are health authorities doing now? Br Med J doi
  12. (1993). of the Environment. In Public Health: responsibilities of the NHS and the roles of others. HSG(93)56 London; Department of Health;
  13. (2004). Public health capacity in the new primary care organisations: defining a workforce that is fit for the purpose. Critical Public Health doi
  14. Public health preparedness for mass casualty events: a 2002 state by state assessment.
  15. (1988). Sir Donald : Public health in England: The report of the committee of inquiry into the future development of the public health function.
  16. (2005). Sir Nigel : Commissioning a patient led NHS. Department of Health
  17. (2005). Stata User's Guide. Version 9.0 College Station, doi
  18. (2005). The geographical distribution of specialists in public health in the United Kingdom: is capacity related to need? Public Health doi
  19. (1990). The Stafford outbreak of Legionnaires' disease. Epidemiology and infection doi
  20. (2005). Timen A: The control of infectious diseases in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.