Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

POD analysis and prediction of cavity flow instability

By E.J. Brooksbank and Aldo Rona


This is the author's final draft of the paper published as Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA, 8-11 July, 2002, pp. 1-7.The Ninth International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV9) was co-sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the University of Central Florida (UCF) and the International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration (IIAV).Aircraft with internal store bays are subject to large amplitude pressure oscillations that, at certain flow conditions, may damage both the bay and the stores. To control these oscillations, a method is required to predict in real-time the store bay flow conditions and use these predictions as feed-back to a control device. This study addresses the design of such a flow predictor, based on a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) approach.\ud A time dependent numerical model has been developed to investigate the instability of a Mach 1.5 cavity flow. The numerically generated flow history is analysed through the use of POD. Using the methods of snapshots, the large-scale features of the cavity flow can be captured in only a few eigenmodes. A novel method is presented whereby the flow can be accurately predicted, beyond the initial flow history, by decomposing the coefficients applied to the eigenmodes into a short discrete Fourier series.\ud Results are presented for the flow state predicted 10 fundamental instability mode periods beyond the end of the initial flow history. The method is shown to be very effective and predicted pressures at the downstream edge of the cavity are in excellent agreement with a comparative CFD computation. The accuracy of the prediction is shown to be dependent on the number of snapshots taken for the POD analysis. When a small non-optimal number of snapshots is used, the pressure fluctuation amplitude is not adequately predicted. Even so, the error in phase is small and the general structure of the pressure trace is still captured, making the current method a good candidate for active flow control

Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1988). An experimental and computational investigation into shear layer driven single and multiple cavity flowfields,
  2. (1961). An investigation of separated flow - Part I: The pressure field,”
  3. (2001). An overview of computational aeroacoustic techniques applied to cavity noise prediction,” doi
  4. (1996). Analysis of unsteady cavity flow employing an adaptive meshing algorithm,” doi
  5. (1996). Cavity pressure oscillations: The generating mechanism visualized,” doi
  6. (1995). Compressible cavity flow oscillation due to shear layer instabilities and pressure feed-back,” doi
  7. (1971). Flow-induced pressure oscillations in shallow cavities,” doi
  8. (2002). Injection parameters for an effective passive control of cavity flow instability,” doi
  9. (2001). Non-uniform total temperature in a turbulent vortex street,” doi
  10. (2002). POD analysis of sound generation by a turbulent jet,” doi
  11. (2000). Resolving the dependence on free-stream values for the k-omega turbulence model,”
  12. (1967). The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows,”
  13. (1999). Unsteady laminar and turbulent cavity flow models by second order upwind methods,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.