Location of Repository

Towards a method for postcolonial development geography? Possibilities and challenges.

By Parvati Raghuram and Clare Madge

Abstract

The definitive version of this paper is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com.In this paper we explore the contours of a ‘method’ for postcolonial development geography, which makes it possible to imagine another ‘world-picturing’. We suggest three steps towards such a method. First, we propose that a postcolonial method involves thinking about why we are doing research in the south in the first place; how we come to and produce our questions; and how we analyze and represent our findings based on our subject positionings. Second, that we need to recognize theorization as an inherent part of method, rethink how we currently theorize and reconfigure our methods of theorization to address wider political aims. Problematizing theorization helps challenge the universalism of Eurocentric theories, thus enabling development geography to move towards more decolonized versions and visions. Finally, that this must be accompanied by firmer recognition of our multiple investments – personal, institutional and geopolitical – and how they frame the possibilities for change. These are some possible steps that we think can reconfigure the ‘scholarly track’ that postcolonial development geographers traverse.This journal has ELF, which permits final draft after 12 months.Peer-reviewedPost-prin

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Year: 2006
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/2163
Journal:

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000a) Postcolonial geographies: an exploratory essay. doi
  2. (2000b) Recontextualising positionality: geographical research and academic fields of power. doi
  3. (2003). (Dis)locating South Asian women in the Academy. doi
  4. (2003). [this issue] Pandurang M
  5. (2004). Activist geographies: building possible worlds.
  6. (1997). Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science. doi
  7. (2004). Articulating the postcolonial (with economics in mind).
  8. (1993). Boundary disputes: comments on Sidaway.
  9. (2006). Claims: a postcolonial geographical critique of „partnership‟ in development discourse. doi
  10. (2002). Collaborating across our differences. doi
  11. (2003). Collaboration across borders: moving beyond positionality. doi
  12. (2002). Cultural geography: postcolonial cultural geographies. doi
  13. (2003). Cultures and spaces of postcolonial knowledges. In doi
  14. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. doi
  15. (2002). Deliver us from evil? Prospects for living ethically and acting politically in human geography. doi
  16. (2005). Development and geography: towards a postcolonial development geography. doi
  17. (2003). Development Fieldwork: A Practical Guide. doi
  18. (2004). Development, postcolonialism and feminist political geography.
  19. (1999). Do they need ivory in Africa? Ruminations of an African geographer trained abroad.
  20. (2003). Editorial: new perspectives on the politics of development in Africa. doi
  21. (2006). Editors‟ introduction: postcolonial geographies of development. doi
  22. (2002). Footloose researchers, „travelling‟ theories and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. doi
  23. (2005). Geography and gender: feminist methodologies in collaboration in the field. doi
  24. (2002). Global and world cities: a view from off the map. doi
  25. (2005). Global comparativism. doi
  26. (1995). in collaboration with Arrevillaga doi
  27. (1992). In other worlds: on the politics of research by „First world‟ geographers in the „Third world‟.
  28. (2004). Introduction: indigeneity and universality in social science. In Mukherji P, Sengupta C (eds) Indigeneity and Universality in Social Science, [missing pp nos.
  29. (1991). Introduction. In Adam I, Tiffin H (eds), Past the Last Post. Theorizing Post-Colonialism and Post-Modernism, vii-xvi. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
  30. (2003). Looking deep into the surface: critical thinking and uncritical geography, Environment and Planning D:
  31. (2003). Material geographies and postcolonialism. doi
  32. Mawdsley E (eds) (2003) Special issue on fieldwork in the tropics.
  33. (1992). Medicine, Money and Masquerades: Gender, Collecting and Rural Development in The Gambia. PhD thesis, [MISSING: [i] dept/inst; [ii] university [iii] town/county. GEOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT,
  34. (2003). Melodramatic postures and constructions. doi
  35. (2003). Multiple identities, representations and categorisations: experiences in the study of people's life-worlds in rural Malawi. doi
  36. (1999). Not so distant, not so strange: the personal and the political in participatory research. doi
  37. (2004). Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. doi
  38. (2001). Participation: the New Tyranny. doi
  39. (2003). Postcolonial geographies of place and migration. In doi
  40. (2003). Postcolonialising geography: tactics and pitfalls. doi
  41. (2002). Postcolonialism. doi
  42. (1997). Postgraduate Fieldwork in Developing Areas: A Rough Guide.
  43. (2004). Practising Human Geography. Sage London.
  44. (1982). Reading for the best Marx: history-writing and historical abstraction.
  45. (1999). Research, action and „critical geographies‟. doi
  46. (2003). River of resistance: critical collaboration and the dilemmas of power and ethics.
  47. (1989). Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black. doi
  48. (2004). The Practice of Cultural Studies. doi
  49. (1993). The right to write about Africa. Unpubl paper, available at http://www.geog.le.ac.uk/staff/cm12/ .
  50. (2002). The Sirens‟ voices: field practices and dialogue in geography. doi
  51. (1984). The World, the Text and the Critic. doi
  52. (2002). Trotz A doi
  53. (2003). Under the Microscope: fieldwork practice and Cuba‟s biotechnology industry: a reflexive affair? doi
  54. (2003). Working together: feminist perspectives on collaborative research and action.
  55. (1997). You can't take the subway to the field!” “Village” Epistemologies in the Global Village‟,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.