Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Who gets privatised? An empirical analysis of Polish manufacturing

By Katarzyna Mikolajczyk and Barbara M. Roberts

Abstract

This paper employs a multinomial logit model to examine what determines the choice\ud of a particular firm for a given privatisation method. A variety of hypotheses about\ud possible determinants of ownership change are tested using an extensive data set for\ud Polish manufacturing at the beginning of transition. The results at a firm as well as at\ud a sector level give strong support to the hypothesis of the importance of resource\ud constraints on the choice of ownership. Large firms with high financing requirement\ud are more likely to be owned by outsiders. High sectoral capital intensity discourages\ud small insider owned firms while high degree of product differentiation is a constraint\ud for different investors, with the exception of outsiders. We also find that firm quality,\ud measured by profitability and exporting outside the Soviet block, appeals to all types\ud of investors but, additionally, privatisation offers outsiders ways of entering sectors\ud with substantial entry barriers

Topics: privatisation methods, ownership change, multinomial logit
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/4628

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A Guide to Modern Econometrics,
  2. (1997). After voucher privatisation: The structure of corporate ownership in Russian manufacturing industry”, CEPR Discussion Paper No 1736.
  3. (2003). Choice of ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Estonia”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper 560.
  4. (2002). Competition, innovation and growth in transition: Exploring the interactions between policies”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper 501. doi
  5. (2001). Comptetion and enterprise performance in transition economies: Evidence from a cross-country survey”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper 376. doi
  6. (2002). Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey”, doi
  7. (2003). Entry and exit in a transitional economy: The case of Poland”,
  8. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect or both?”, doi
  9. (2000). Firm performance and the political economy of corporate governance: doi
  10. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatisation”, doi
  11. (1997). From theory into practice? Restructuring and dynamism in transition economies”, doi
  12. (2003). Mass privatisation, corporate governance and endogenous ownership structure”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper 596. doi
  13. (1997). Non-standard methods in the privatisation strategies of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland”, doi
  14. (1998). On privatisation methods in Eastern Europe and their implications”, doi
  15. (1995). On the productivity and plant ownership change: new evidence from the Longitudinal Research Database”, doi
  16. (1995). Ownership, governance and restructuring”, in Transition Report, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  17. (2001). Priorities and sequencing in privatisation: Theory and evidence from the Czech Republic”, William Davidson Institute Working Paper 323a. doi
  18. (1997). Privatisation incidence, ownership forms, and firm performance: Evidence from Slovenia”, doi
  19. (1995). Report on progress in ownership transformation,
  20. (2000). Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis, doi
  21. (1997). Takeover activity among financial mutuals: An analysis of target characteristics”, doi
  22. (1987). The determinants of entry and exit reconsidered”, doi
  23. (1988). The determinants of manufacturing ownership in less developed countries”, doi
  24. (2002). The effect of ownership and competitive pressure on firm performance in transition countries: Micro evidence from Bulgaria, Romania and Poland”, William Davidson Institute Discussion Paper 434. doi
  25. (1988). The effect of takeover activity on corporate research and development”, in doi
  26. (1997). The impact of Czech privatisation methods on enterprise performance incorporating initial selection-bias correction”, doi
  27. (1999). The nature and determinants of ownership changes after privatisation: Evidence from Estonia”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.