Location of Repository

Robust Benefit Function Transfer: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach

By Roberto León-González and Riccardo Scarpa

Abstract

A Benefit Function Transfer obtains estimates of Willingness-to-Pay (WTP) for the evaluation of a given policy at a site by combining existing information from different study sites. This has the advantage that more efficient estimates are obtained, but it relies on the assumption that the heterogeneity between sites is appropriately captured in the Benefit Transfer model. A more expensive alternative to estimate WTP is to analyse only data from the policy site in question while ignoring information from other sites. We make use of the fact that these two choices can be viewed as a model selection problem and extend the set of models to allow for the hypothesis that the benefit function is only applicable to a subset of sites. We show how Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) techniques can be used to optimally combine information from all models.\ud The Bayesian algorithm searches for the set of sites that can form the basis for estimating a Benefit function and reveals whether such information can be transferred to new sites for which only a small dataset is available. We illustrate the method with a sample of 42 forests from U.K. and Ireland. We find that BMA benefit function transfer produces reliable estimates and can increase about 8 times the information content of a small sample when the forest is 'poolable'

Topics: Benefit Transfer, Bayesian Model Averaging, Exchangeability, Non-market Valuation, Panel Data
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/4498

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). A Bayesian Model for Benefit Transfer: Application to National Parks in Spain. doi
  2. (1971). An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics, doi
  3. (1983). Applications of Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics. doi
  4. (2004). Bayesian Analysis of Interval Data Contingent Valuation Models and Pricing Policies. doi
  5. (2005). Bayesian Auxiliary Variable Models for Binary and Multinomial Regression. Bayesian Analysis, doi
  6. (2003). Bayesian Econometrics. doi
  7. (1992). Bayesian exchangeability, benefit transfer, and research efficiency. doi
  8. (2001). Benchmark priors for Bayesian model averaging. doi
  9. (1999). Benefit value transfers conditional on site attributes: some evidence of reliability from forest recreation in Ireland. Chapter 11 in Environmental value transfer: issues and methods. Edited by Sta˚le Navrud and Richard Ready, doi
  10. (1997). Calibrating Benefit function transfer to assess the conservation reserve program. doi
  11. (2003). Discussion: Performance of Bayesian Model Averaging. doi
  12. (1997). Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry. doi
  13. (2005). Flexible mixture distribution modeling of dichotomous choice contingent valuation with heterogeneity. doi
  14. (2006). Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer for Resource Valuation-Addressing Classical Challenges with BayesianModeling. Forthcoming in doi
  15. (1992). On separating defensible benefit transfer from ‘smoke and mirrors’, doi
  16. (2006). Regionality Revisited: An Examination of the Direction of Spread of Currency Crises. Manuscript available at: http://fmg.lse.ac.uk/∼amil/rr.pdf doi
  17. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis, doi
  18. (1995). Testing transferability of recreation demand models across regions - A study of corps of engineer reservoirs. doi
  19. (1992). The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: benefit function transfer. doi
  20. (2003). The Social And Environmental Benefits Of Forests In Great Britain.” Report to The Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, by Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal & Management,
  21. (2005). Validity Tests of Benefit Transfer: Are we performing the wrong tests? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.