Location of Repository

Wages, Supervision and Sharing:An Analysis of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey

By Sarah B. Brown and John G. Sessions


Instrumental efficiency wage models predict an inverse relationship between wages and supervision with this relationship becoming more pronounced amongst firms that participate in some form of employee sharing. To be sure, our theoretical exposition predicts that an increase in total remuneration will elicit a larger cut in optimal monitoring in ‘sharing’ rather than ‘non sharing’ firms. In this paper, we explore these predictions empirically using the British 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. Our results confirm an inverse relationship between supervision and pay but the trade-off is only heightened by the presence of performance related pay and employee share ownership schemes. We also find that employee share ownership and performance related pay are relatively more successful in alleviating the need to monitor, with the rate of profit sharing impacting insignificantly on the level supervision

Topics: monitoring, supervision, profit sharing, employee share ownership, efficiency wages
Publisher: Dept. of Economics, University of Leicester
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/4486

Suggested articles



  1. (1994). Bosses of Different Stripes: A Cross-National Perspective
  2. (1987). cAdam s. doi
  3. (1987). Carrots and Sticks: Pay, Supervision and Turnover.’ doi
  4. (1994). Compensating W age Differentials versus Efficiency W ages: An Em pirical
  5. (1985). Does a Flexible Industry W age Structure Increase Em ploym ent?
  6. (1995). Employee Participation, Ownership and Productivity: A Theoretical Framework.’Industrial Relations,344, doi
  7. (1984). Equilibrium Unemployment as a W orker Discipline Device. doi
  8. (1995). Is there a Trade-off between Supervision and W ages? An Em pirical
  9. (1982). Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange.’ doi
  10. (1991). Ownership, Agency and W ages: An Exam ination of Franchising in the Fast Food Industry.’ doi
  11. (1990). Participation, Productivity and the Firm’s Environment.’ In doi
  12. (1979). Quasi-W alrasian Theories of Unem ploym ent.’
  13. (1979). Rights and Production Functions: An Application to LabourM anaged Firm s and Codeterm ination.’
  14. (1987). Sum m ers.
  15. (1989). Supervision and High W ages as Com peting Incentives: A Basis for Labour M arket Segm entation Theory.’
  16. (1993). Supervision and W ages across doi
  17. (1976). The Challenge of Segm ented Labor M arket Theories to Orthodox Theory.’
  18. (1985). The Production Process in a Com petitive Econom y:
  19. (1995). The Relationship between Supervision and Pay: doi
  20. (1990). The Structure of Supervision and Pay in doi
  21. (1957). The Task of Contem porary W age Theory.’ In
  22. (1987). The Theory of Contracts.’
  23. (1962). W age Differentials: Theory and M easurem ent.’
  24. (1990). W ho Bosses W hom ?
  25. (1986). W orkplace Democracy: The Political Effects of Participation,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.